For the world of game justice is even slower

Perhaps, only as regards the public game and i Best casino sites, you can attend such a "legal treatment" put in place towards a play of the playful sector that opposes the removal of its public games: in fact, postponement by the Trga di Bolzano of the hearing of merit of "just almost A year ”, in January 2020. Luckily, at least, that in the meantime the games will not be removed from the applicant's premises and the relative damage, therefore, are exclusively of a "psychological" nature and uncertainty for the future! But when we talk about the world of games, everything is possible even if, unfortunately, our justice is slow, certainly and objectively, for all the processes and of any sector it is, which unfortunately public opinion is well conscious: But, since it is a commercial activity, perhaps we should be more prompt in disqualifying the causes and in admitting sentences. But anyway, we are in USA, justice is this and with this the common citizen must be compared.

This sentence, quite serious in the length of the times for a possible solution, was decided by the Regional Court of Administrative Justice of Bolzano. The same judges, however, also recall that in the last month of February, the applicant had asked for a postponement of the discussion of the appeal since at that Trga there were other causes of the same tenor: that is, disputes on the question of the "so -called distanziometer" which are have been postponed pending the publication of the decision of the Council of State. Decision no. 1618/2019 issued on 11 March 2019 and a few days after the request for postponement proposed by the applicant. Moreover, at the public hearing of 20 March 2019, always the defense of the applicant, insisted on his own request for postponement in order to view the sentence and related reasons for the Council of State. In that hearing, the defense of the provincial administration put every decision to the college, while the defense of the municipal administration was opposed to the postponement, insisting on the decision of the case.

In any case, the ordinance of the Trga concludes: "The postponement required, on the one hand does not affect the public interests involved in any way, given that the effects of the contested documents have never been suspended, and on the other hand safeguard The applicant's right of defense ". These lines that we wanted to write to "tell" the process of some causes that affect the game, and in this case the usual "distanziometer" absolute cross of many playful activities and particularly of those operating in the province of Bolzano, have as their objective to underline how much insecurity and how little tranquility can exist in those who still believe in the business of the public game of state. There are, still today, many appeals that debate at the various regional administrative courts and that have "different" results by virtue of the interpretations of the respective judges. The operators of the game are extending, objectionately, many money to see their right "to exist" in the area, despite the presence, will never stop saying it, of the concession to represent the state in the offer of the public product.

The insecurity and the little tranquility that exists in the world of games is palpable, in particular in some territories as it can be that of Bolzano, where the game has been opposed from the beginning and where the province of Bolzano sought in all ways of making it difficult, if not unusable, its commercial path. But despite this declared aversion, there are still playful activities that want to continue with their work and who are insisting on continuing to "risk their money and their professionalism" while waiting for the decision of the judges who, as we have seen in the lines Previous, they take somewhat long times in expanding. Even the public game, unfortunately, is "shredded" by the length of justice which in our country, of course, is not flowing as it should be. And without entering the political controversy it is not only the game sector what is particularly affected, but almost all commercial segments, unfortunately.

In the event that we wanted to exhibit at least, the playful activity and the relative public games have not been removed and, consequently many economic problems have not been addressed: but what to say of the insurviousness that an operator must feel not knowing how and up to When will it be able to carry out your lawful activity? As you can think of making investments, which, moreover, the yellow-green executive requires as can be seen from the issue of the Dignity Decree, for a future that is not known if there will be, or if the world of games will collapse following everyone The increases in taxation that continue to rage? How can you think of a near future when, almost, there is no present in the playful sector? Obviously, it is not known if the operators in the sector will submit all these questions, but if they want to call entrepreneurs of the game certainly some questions relating to their future will have to ask it. And the answers that can make light in a dark future are certainly not pleasant.

The national law on the game, which could clarify many unpleasant situations for playful activities, does not arrive and does not even have a hint, justice is long and the decisions of the various courts "lengthen in the timing", the interpretations of the various judges They do not follow a single line since the "jagged" standards that exist today let themselves be interpreted subjectively and, therefore, if you appeal to a legislation you never know what the interpretation of those who will then have to judge the appeals will be ... the game and the world of sport bets, his companies with his operators to be able to continue in a commercial path that certainly did not think was so daring and hindered by the state that puts them in a position not to operate? Unfortunately, it will be necessary to wait for the government's "definitive decisions" towards the playful sector: will it make him continue to exist or will he sweep him away from the American territory, as heralded in the pre-election phase? Who can say it today ... the premises are certainly not the best.

Publication date: April 9, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly