For some, gambling is to be banned regardless

There is nothing more to say: for some, both gambling, including the American Casino sites, that the advertisement that "sponsors" it would both be only to be banned. And that's that. "Forbidden": word that would have no other free interpretation if not that of a naked and raw, but absolutely clear ban. But it is all too evident that between the "forbidden smoking" and "prohibited advertising to the games" perhaps, some differences that causes problems is there. And there is also the certainty that the former has not forced citizens to quit smoking, as the latter will not ban the field of a certain type of advertising. In short, "we are still here" to discuss the prohibition of advertising to games and bets with varied points of view, from the most permissive of citizens to the most austere ones of the respectable respectable people contrary to everything related to the game, since they are considered immoral and improper. There are those who also claim that the industries of the gambling sector with could be considered "business freedom" as they are without the social utility requirement ...

Everything, of course, in absolute contradiction with the fact that the game chain, and its companies, act in a legal market, naturally regulated, covered by state concession. But the situation that The games sector He is experiencing today, particularly after the ban on advertising, it appears increasingly tangled. Especially after the notorious guidelines of AGCOM who attempted to shed light on "old" rules that intersected with the "new" ones creating even more disarray, even less transparency and making even more difficult the "recreational commercial life" from Whatever part you look. The executive "launched the stone" (of the ban) but then "hidden the hand" which first should have signed the reorganization of the games so as not to leave everyone with the breath suspended and at the mercy of alternative interpretations. But this is the public game: and now the companies will have to look for their space and their way of life, facing the situations that will present themselves as some of them will certainly be atypical.

And it is certainly not a good commercial life. It has already become difficult for any exercise to follow the rules and articles of the code and make the end of the day budget (and not only in the playful sector of course), let alone when the rules are composed of many words, complicated and difficult to put into practice in life real. It seems that the executive, in the drafting of the prohibition of advertising, "has been applied to confuse ideas", rather than to clarify them and make their application possible and easy! And since the executive wanted to make "order and cleanliness" on the advertising to protect players from the risk of the abuse of the gamble game, he had the task of having absolutely clear and univocal rules to make this ban applicable in a perfect way. Instead, with the form of this prohibition, the aim is not achieved and beyond. It is nothing more than to discuss further, and to mix the ideas between old rules and new rules, hoping that all this does not convince people to hate the gambling lawful for its little clarity.

The reality of the market is that the prohibition has however become operational: but it was to be a "hard, pragmatic" measure, while it remains only on paper and in the various externalizations of its "creator", vice-snellato vice-stalled Luigi Di Maio. On the games market, however, everything is upside down and waiting for light to be shed, since the guidelines of AGCOM are not currently "to turn on the switch" of clarity. AGCOM has used terms such as "proportionality, balance and reasonableness": terms that have allowed many companies to continue their path as if they were life -saving in the water and to which someone could stick so as not to drown. And not even this was expected: evidently, the ban is too "inaccurate", since if you wanted a good result, we did not have to use half words but needed more firmness. Instead, so only the current confusion was created, which has been dragging itself for a year, from the moment of the real issue of the ban.

After many disquisitions, surely, we will also arrive at the time of the "ballet of responsibilities" with the various incorporated discharges-children, typical of our American policy, knowing well that the not very transparent result of this provision seems to be traced back to a deficiency of clarity and lack of uniqueness of the rules that the government has been "in a hurry to launch": this time, however, making it convert into law, not as it happened with the agreement agreed and signed in the unified conference that had also partially faced the inventory "Territorial question", but which then the executive of the time did not have time to convert with the relative implementation decree. It seems the strategy of "not completely doing" the one that grips the decisions that are taken against the world of public game.

It must be emphasized that precisely in the public game, during the course of the last fifteen years, it had to be attended by the birth of many rules, then in practice emptied of their strength: the gambling does not want it, but if you need it. You want to remove it from the power of organized crime, but you do not want to give him the rules that make him shine for his legality. You want to protect the players, but today that legality and those rules that for years have allowed us to choose between the legitimate game and what is not for years is removed. Certainly it requires its reform, but it is not done: meanwhile, however, the taxation on the sector are increased which are the most "dear" at European level and that do not come to equal any other commercial or services sector. Perhaps, the confusion that reigns in the minds of the various executives that have followed is the one that is reflected in the legislation that would like to regulate the sector. Then?

Publication date: August 15, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly