What we have to wait for the future game reform

First point: When it comes to future game reform and when we talk about the government of change ... everything could be expected, particularly after the provision of the Dignity Decree and the ban on the advertising it contains. So it is assumed that we continue on the path of prohibition, perhaps sweetened in order to "do not completely disappear the gambling" from the American territory, keeping "good" as well as its possible resources and not to go on the one hand completely To annihilate a sector that "can be useful to the nation", but on the other not by disavowing their promises put in place in the electoral period. In short, the normal citizen who follows politics, but not precisely the problems of the world of games, it can be said that they expect everything and the opposite of everything.

Second point: Certainly, the government of change will have to, in its future reform, face the "hot" problem of the Piedmont region where in practice, with the implementation of the local law on the game that almost completely expected from the territory legitimate game You are with thousands of companies that will have to be "reinvented", or move, or change the sector even, if not to close and fire their employees. You are also curious to see how the executive will face this "thorn in the side", but it is sure that it will face it with the attitude that the two sides find themselves and with a non -benevolent eye towards the games.

Third point: What is missing, in any case, and not only in Piedmont, are the active policies that contrast the problematic game, the training in schools, the national campaigns on the responsible game, the investment in training for the operators: but this undoubtedly presupposes that The world of games "continue to exist" and with the Chiari di Luna that the new government has made it clear who knows in the general reform of the game what will appear. What without doubt will not be enough is the only prohibition of advertising that still appears cloaked in pure demagogy today: indeed, punishes sports sponsorships and companies that promote the legitimate, authorized and controlled game.

Se poi ci si troverà, in modo parallelo, a che il Governo vada ad autorizzare una nuova serie di gratta& vinci anche da 20 euro per un solo biglietto ci si troverà di fronte, come di consueto peraltro, a scelte ipocrite che si andranno a commentare da sole. For the overall reform of the sector, therefore, the government will have to think of the wide range and, above all, of a horizontal reduction of all games and not only of entertainment equipment, in addition to the stop to new forms of instant lot and, particularly, must think about the mandatory use of the tax code to access slot or videolottery, to the regulation of the game rooms and the contrast to crime particularly the one "connected and combined" to the illegal game that, particularly in the last period, truly travel hand in hand. And to do this there is no doubt that the regions and local authorities in contrast policies must be involved.

Fourth point: In the reform then, it could also be included that a part of the tax levy on the game should remain in the area precisely to finance campaigns in the media and in schools as well as creating funds for the support of the families of those involved in the problematic game. But despite the tendency of the new yellow-green government both against gambling with the reform, "prohibition crusades" should be avoided intelligently, which would be demagogic and which tend, above all, to criminalize the lawful game and not its excesses: Just as drinking a good glass of wine a day does not cause damage and does not transform into alcoholics, even responsible game is a free choice of entertainment and pastime like many others, to be managed in a careful way.

But, in any case, the problematic and compulsive player must be helped, while illegality must be fought with more rules, more controls and more penalties. In addition to the prohibition of advertising, one should continue with the "Reform track" implemented by the previous legislature: further reducing the playing points and studying the characteristics that seem better for the protection of players. It would take a national regulation without a doubt, but which leaves the local authorities autonomy in relation to some issues such as identification and distances from sensitive places, as well as the times of use and sale of games. Many times it has been repeated that local authorities know the territory and their citizens deeply: therefore who better than them can regulate "their spaces"? Then, in the future reform, it would be truly desirable that the theme of the online and the introduction of the health card to access the games.

Fifth point: The municipalities, together with the social health companies, have the pulse of the situation on the territories so that they can enter into the merits of the awareness of the population with respect to the phenomenon of the game. It is clear, also, that in the future reform, particular resources must also be provided to devote precisely to local authorities to put into practice training and information: resources that must be received by the same state, but not as up to now, must be done really otherwise the purposes that you can prefigure will not be reached. So far the regions and local authorities have made almost "their own pocket" but honestly it can be said that positive results, or that they can be declared such, have not materialized.

It really takes "a blow of a buoy" to change direction: it may be that the government of change has this strength, that it manages to "subvert" what has been (or not been) done so far by previous legislatures. The determination is undoubtedly lacking in the two sides that "manage" our country and the hope that this determination can be conveyed not only to destroy the playful sector (and little we lack with the dignity decree), but also by studying something special that He can regulate public gambling, the load -bearing column of the American economy and support of many resources that have been working in the sector for many years with satisfaction and professionalism.

Publication date: 18 September 2018 at 11:27 am

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly