The unified conference and the following decree never arrived

More than once it was underlined how important it would be for public game and for i Best legal mess on the internet, that to the agreement signed by all the protagonists of the unified conference in September 2017 was followed by the relative implementation decree to give you official value and to come, therefore, applied to the recreational sector and to everything that runs around it and that composes it. How, more and more than once, it was stressed that this agreement would have placed once and for all the long -standing "territorial question" which makes the commercial paths of the game activities uninhabitable, obviously legitimate companies that represent, for those who still do not know , the state by means of concessions and offer state game products. In recent times, that notorious agreement has been "returning to fashion" as the most important figure of the interpreter of that agreement, Undersecretary Pier Paolo Baretta also today with the delegation to the games to "arrange" the playful sector and its businesses null

The agreement, in reality, has always had a certain value, albeit not protected by the relative implementation decree, also because it was recalled more than once in the judgments of the Council of State, since last year, when he had struck the hypothesis of the Executive to create a tender for the renewal of the concessions of the terrestrial game. The CDS had underlined to the MEF that thinking about a new announcement in the absence of a national reorganization of the game, and therefore with the asphyxiating presence of the territorial question, it would have been "an incomprehensible absurd act" since the same prevented the future dealers from having The certainty, once the authorization to the game has been acquired, to be able to always exercise it due to the restrictive rules that did not allow the opening of the same activities in certain situations. Perhaps the MEF had not thought of this "small detail" that opposed the new activities? Or was there only the need to ban, which, among other things, had been so urged by the operators, to have an economic profit that made very "comfortable" to the tax funds?

Of course these two questions are incredible, if you think that the game concessions have a remarkable cost and the insiders who invest, despite everything, in the business business think with this authorization to be protected and protected being the state: but never As in the last two or three years, having a concession certainly cannot be a deal! Indeed, it almost seems that the last executives have done, and are doing, of everything to put the sticks in the wheels to anyone who wants to look out the world of legal gamblingnull So why did the MEF want to do this tender last year? It wanted the intervention of the CDS to make it reflect and to request information on the motivation for which the 2017 agreement was not followed by the relevant implementation decree that would have ended an unreasonable situation that blocks the game market? We want to think that then this provision was not made in conscience only for the change of the executive and for the confusion that followed and certainly not for some dark movement contrary to the public game!

But, for what is aware of the writer, the MEF did not give official response to the CDS and did not even follow the requests of the latter to "provide more in -depth and complete assessments" on the event of implementing the signed agreement at a unified conference in the absence of the ministerial implementation decree. Of course, if there had been a coherent response from the MEF, a huge step would have taken forward in the world of game and there would have been all those appeals to the various TAR of the territories involved in sterile diatribes that could have been truly resolved with " Little "or with" so much will to reform the games sector ". It has not been made little nor so much: the recreational sector and its market are still, with everything that can achieve above all after all the disaster consequent the health emergency and with the economic one that "is making highly salty accounts" a many companies and their workers.

And not only that: the MEF has also passed over the questions of the Council of State and the current executive has even anticipated the issuance of the tenders thus adding, in addition to the renewal of the concessions of bets and the bingo also the issue of entertainment equipment that they will still expire in 2024: But perhaps it would be necessary to be calm on this topic since, without a doubt because of the pandemic, the yellow-red executive does not seem able to organize a renewal procedure, but could make the hypothesis of an extension, just for change. In fact, the extension for what concerns the bingo and the Betting They are a more than known procedure that has already been seen and revised, and beyond everything that does not appear at all welcome to Europe, especially when understanding that the extensions are put in place in order not to make the reforms.

And perhaps out of respect for Europe, but we are sure not for the respect that should be the whole chain of the game that is "reserve of state", the government will have to intervene, albeit unwillingly and despite this it is not the best period, seen which will soon be in other chores (certainly most important than the game and the poker) overlooking! But this time the executive will have to do its evaluations well: if it implemented the long -awaited national reorganization of the game, it would first of all give a satisfactory response to the criticisms raised by the Council of State on the races for the renewal of concessions, would then resolve the territorial question e It would also begin a profitable path for a truly sustainable new recreational sector. But not only that, with the reorganization, the executive would restore a series of revenues for its tax funds essential to face the economic rebirth of our country. And at least this last point cannot leave it indifferent because it is the health of all our boot, from north to south everyone needs to leave and the public game honestly could give an important hand if the reorganization finally saw the light.

Publication date: 10 September 2020 at 16:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly