Some regions do not face the game constructively

Pending the delegated law on the game and on Best online casino That perhaps is coming from afar, in the various regions you have to face the many problems of the world of games which, if something suddenly does not happen for the current legislation, will soon emerge concrete for the various legal game activities in relation to imminent deadlines that some sudden regional laws will impose. READ "CAPESTRO" now too well known to anyone who frequent even the playful sector even a little and who prevent public play from carrying out their task as "state reserves" and, therefore, representatives of legality in the area and safety for citizens When, even, you do not get to expel them from your areas with all the practical consequences that follow: closure of the doors of many companies and consequent dismissal of the related employees. And certainly not because of a bad management of the same commercial and legal activities, but for the exclusive "will" of the regional administrations that do not want to hear reasons when we hear about the "phenomenon" game.

In the face of these "capestro" laws, often and not so happy, the operators turn to the various TAR to see their rights acclaimed and more than one appeal comes to the Council of State that "sometimes" is also expressed in favor of gamble, underlining that some laws can be considered expelled for legal game activities. But not even this seems to stop the various administrations that "pull the right" on their way, clashing more and more often with the game activities and putting its operators, and always the related employees, in extreme difficulty. There would also be an important topic to underline since recently, at the beginning of the year, the Council of State expressed itself on the possible unconstitutionality of these prohibition laws: and if this were to "come true", a disaster would be created for the coffers of the various Regions as, most likely, all those companies that have been forced to close due to the already recalled "capestro" laws and perhaps also the employees who have lost their jobs should most likely compensate.

But the regions are "deaf" and do not want to evaluate these possibilities, and they are reluctant to face constructive reflections on any future problems, trying to find a solution for the public game whose work possibility is definitely prevented due to the various distancies and oppressed by Time bands of ignition of entertainment appliances. But, evidently, you really don't want to find a positive solution and in some cases you do not intend to give the possibility to public game and the sport bets to continue to represent the legality in the area, leaving the latter in the hands of the illegal game: since evidently these regulatory restrictions are worth only for legal activities, while those that are surely not continuing to work, collecting and replenishing their coffers by putting in Acts a form of illegal unfair competition that is destroying the territory and entire sector. But despite this, and despite the pandemic emergency it should have taught something in this sense, we continue to contrast the public game without reflecting on what it entails and produces.

It should not be forgotten, and the writer certainly does not do so, that the closure of the many game companies inevitably involves an employment problem that is added to the missed income that to the various regions could come from public game and from poker online, just as you should materialize with the new reorganization. But waiting for the reform of the entire playful world what do your companies do? By now they can no longer survive since, first of all, the restrictions now known for the fight against the contagions to the reopening of the activities after the pandemic have become "affected", and then the comparison with the number of access to the game points That they were not as striking as we imagined, and finally the "capestro" laws that have promptly recurred to the restart of the game market and who prevent them from working as operators would have in mind to continue doing. And without forgetting that throughout the very long period of closing the game points the management costs of the various activities remained without support by the State.

In fact, with the various DPCMs he supported almost all sectors, except that of the game: or at least he has provided to give some of his companies truly negligible figures. Therefore, even if these are all very valid topics that should make the balance of reasoning and reflections "for the playful world, few regions have made small steps back in relation to their restrictions to encourage the resumption of the economy of the sector, And also to facilitate a restoration of the revenues that the game has always provided to pour into the tax funds and which are now decidedly far away from "that golden era" in which the sector was the third economy of the country. Today, however, it is a rigonfio sector of problems that only the reorganization of the entire same sector could perhaps eliminate. So, perhaps for this too some territories have "stopped" in their absurd and useless war on the legal game and to game app, keeping their laws in stand-by who have already done significant damage even before the pandemìa.

While other regions "smile reassuring" towards their citizens confirming that they have put in place strategies to counter the game on the territory "sometimes even masking it" as an intervention to counter the problematic game: but neither distanziometers, nor the time slots of ignition They are "tools" suitable for "removing the desire for game" to those who want to play. Outside of this no territory has managed to have "some really brilliant ideas" to make the game public and the bingo online Socially useful above all because with its presence protects the legality and safety of citizens: pity that there is also the rock of the ban on advertising which makes one legal point from another that is not practically unrecognizable. Perhaps the various administrations were interested in this would have less crime around and more legal game: but this would be part of the reflections and constructive strategies ...

Publication date: April 29, 2022 at 14:32

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly