Use and abuse of gambling deserve reflection

There are really no times the times in which from our writing we have attempted to underline that the good part of the players, including those who approached the game and the Casino sites with online slot During the pandemic period, they seek it and frequent it, live it and have fun lightly. They entertain themselves with the many products that the game points offer without becoming problematic players, or worse still pathological, playing with awareness and respect: the investigations that take place on the subject are no longer counted and from the same it emerges that the percentages of the subjects who They are involved in gambling disorder with returning to those numbers that can authorize detractors & companies to continue demonizing the playful world, professionals and even its employees. This peculiarity would like to leave it to politics that sometimes defends the game, sometimes stigmatizes it perhaps even with the deeply objective of collecting some "vote" in favor, but which in any case does not provide for its new regulation.

Reform that perhaps could also mitigate some critical issues that make him judge incorrectly and superficially: to this he undoubtedly contributed the attitude of some credit institutions that even during the pandemic period closed the bank accounts of many game companies considering them at risk for the interests of banks. But, unfortunately, leaving the same companies without the possibility of continuing their commercial or productive path considering that above all the commercial activities that represent the State have the obligation to pass any transaction through a corporate current account. But if the account is closed and no other institute opens a similar one that can ever be activities operating according to the game concessions? An answer that to date remained without satisfaction since the government not even for this problem has managed to find a radical intervention that "obligations" banks to respect the "state reserves" and its insiders.

Institutional intervention that should have forced the same banks not to apply that so -called "ethical relationship" that banking institutions have brought up so as not to "risk much" the economic interests of the banks: even if this attitude was mildly stigmatized, and Unfortunately only in words, from the central government. Just following that questionable discriminatory principle towards the world of games, one should really stop considering the game sector a dangerous sector for those who frequent it, animated by little transparency of those who produce and its products and above all execrable even for those who there there Work. Considering precisely the fact that even the recreational workers themselves found difficulty in interfacing with the banks that considered them "workers at risk" it really seems a paradox keeping in mind that the public game represents the state: but so much, unfortunately. In short, it seems that when it comes to play we enter a sort of "stupid spiral" subject to discrimination, regardless of everything.

And until you get out of this absurd demonization, there will always be a sector that in practice manages to produce interesting resources for the state, to occupy thousands and thousands of workers, to create new very useful professions to employ above all the young people who are definitely Bring yourself to technology and which almost "are born with the mobile phone in hand", but which is not respected: a sector that protects the legality in the area and the health of the players. Who knows that we can discern a subject who is responsibly researching and giving the gamble to an individual who lets himself be overwhelmed by him: as unfortunately it also happens with smoking, alcohol and drugs. Too bad that for smoking and alcohol not such obsessive, pressing, and indonent denigration campaigns are made as they are "fought" against the game. However, to the subjects who make it excessively use there were not current accounts or rejected loans or mortgages for the purchase of a home!

For everything, discernment between use and abuse must be put and until this is applied as a sort of dogma even in the playful world there will always be the uncomfortable presence of the game detractors who continue to launch arrows everywhere in the sector, without distinction of tasks and interventions. Perhaps a greater culture of public game and its "being present" in the area would lead to a greater discernment: perhaps it was not yet enough for these detractors to know what happened during the pandemic emergency when the legal game was required to lower the shutters! The trimming of the illegal game and the increasingly constant presence of the crime that manages it in the area is not a sufficient stimulus to defend public game, and therefore legal, and finally understand its purposes as a sector and also respect those who frequent it conscientiously. But perhaps this perennial prejudice towards the game and players is the fault of the same sector that cannot "make himself known" for how he is in fact.

Today it is the company that deals with the game that its players perhaps reflect a somewhat retrograde image that represents them. But if you cannot overcome this vision even a little obsolete in the world of games, perhaps it would be the task of the central government to defend the "state reserves" as a sword ", tell the work in the social, to make known the insights of the personal investigations which are carried out before issuing an expensive concession on their integrity and economic solvency. These "small" clarifications and information that the state should offer publicly in defense of the entire sector would put in better light everything that is done to represent the legal game in the area. Above all, it should be highlighted that without this presence the country would return back a couple of decades where gambling was certainly illegal and represented by videopoker and organized crime that managed them. Perhaps the detractors would be better for the latter hypothesis and this scenario?

Publication date: 29 July 2024 at 18:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly