Online poker: shared liquidity brings many discussions

The request by two Deputies of Forza Italia of the immediate termination of the adhesion to the European Pact for the shared liquidity of poker online On the one hand it leaves the basiti, since this agreement dates back to July 2017 and signed with France, Spain and Portugal has been in the State State since then: it seems that the current yellow-red executive has absolutely no intention of activating it albeit this agreement He brought several benefits to other countries, while ours remained "stopped at the pole". On the other hand, however, it is not understood that if other nations have "exploited" this agreement and have increased online poker with shared liquidity, our country should not be taken into account, considering the current situation of the world of game, despite The recovery after Lockdown, and with all the damage that the sector suffered in this emergency period. The online is certainly the sector that has undergone less repercussions from the pandemic, but the poker segment is not one of the most "popular" ones and this has already been and even before the crownavirus.

But on the occasion of this parliamentary intervention, one would like to make some light on the shared liquidity that has yet probably been in the mind of many poker fans, and without a doubt in that of the current executive to whom it certainly matters little to what happens in the world of game and of Casino Online. Therefore, a protocol of understanding by ADM, Customs and Monopolies agency, with the French, Spanish and Portuguese regulators for the establishment of a single online poker market was returned to Rome 2017 when it was signed in Rome: Therefore, the so -called "shared international liquidity" which found followed "important" in France, Spain and Portugal but not in USA and still today we do not understand the reason for the American choice. In fact, this agreement would have determined, as it was obvious that it happened, an increase and a relaunch of the offer of online poker, increasing the maximum prize pool and the relative collection.

One of the main international operators, who spoke in a Gaming salon in London, would have shown the effects of shared liquidity in a short sentence: " days of activities, more unique players every quarter, more deposits". So why does our country think differently and never followed the agreement? There is something strange or at least anomalous in this type of attitude chosen by our country, also considering the state of discomfort in which it pays The entire gambling sector And also our economy that would need to be supported: and why not also by online poker income? Or maybe the government is thinking differently and would have in mind to reactivate the agreement by also entering USA into the European network? Apparently it does not appear that the current executive has "desire and time" to apply in a decision in such a delicate field as that of the game: particularly in this phase where the same central state would seem in other affecade chores and where the public game without 'Other cannot cover a particularly elaborate priority or decisions.

But we want to enter even more in the thought according to which the implementation of the intended on shared international liquidity would have a disruptive effect on the national players accustomed to the platforms of our dealers who offer a less risky game and with obviously lower episodes: the Agreement would have a negative effect even on the collection of our operators with consequent negative impact on the revenue and even the employment of the workers employed in the sector. And finally, considering that Pandemìa pushed the choices of the players to use the online game more, it could be verified that the implementation deriving from shared international liquidity could determine a total of negative and immediate effects. But objectively, these thoughts seem to contain several serious inaccuracies that seem to be attributed to the little knowledge of the world of games and the Betting, especially online poker and its "last development" during Lockdown.

Precisely during this last period the American players returned to play poker, even those who had moved away and who spent in other entertainment and with other dealers: therefore, it can undoubtedly confirm that the American players are more than used to playing Online and waiting nothing but having new offers, new costs and even new risks, albeit well calculated but that are part of the same game. In short, it can be said that the shared liquidity is to be interpreted absolutely as a positive fact and not at all in a negative way, as it is feared by the two blue deputies. But the same are firmly convinced, also, that shared liquidity would go against the anti -money laundering guidelines on the game put in place in recent times by ADM and which have proven to be very restrictive also for the physical network as well as for the distance one.

And not only that: the agreement of July 2017 would be clearly in contrast with the choices of our country on public game which, especially in recent months, has launched measures aimed mainly at the protection of the player, health and with the aim of reducing the 'game offer in the area, as well as the contrast of illegal game and recycling. All this should almost oblige the current executive, always according to the two deputies, to give the ADM imput not to absolutely implement the agreement signed on July 6, 2017 relating to shared international liquidity and to terminate it unilaterally in the "as short time possible ". And as a final observation, what proposed could certainly be proposed, however, that if you do not "put your hand to this agreement" and you will return to the "new normality" for the various sectors after the very long Lockdown also of the game, for the operators It will be remarkable damage since they will be unprepared to compete internationally without the shared liquidity that could on the other hand, grant a new breath to our online poker.

Publication date: 22 September 2020 at 16:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly