Puglia: the game regulations are old, a national law is needed

For the world of public game, including the Best Casino in USA Legal, it seems to live in an endless nightmare: the opinion, in fact, of another TAR, that of Puglia, gives reason and believes that the Municipality of Lecce applies the regional law on the game put in place with compliance with the principles of "Reasonableness and proportionality". The same administrative authority thus pronounced, rejected the appeal of a municipal provision by a game company that supported how much the same law on the game sanctioned a "mere and generic prohibition". The judges of the Puglia Tar, on the other hand, believe that the regional rules under accusation are aimed at defining prevention measures to protect the specific vulnerable bands: And in the face of these protection measures, the economic interests of the game company who presented the appeal pass in second order. In support of these fundamental principles expressed, the TAR stresses that it must be kept in mind that the regional law on the game on the game does not contain any unconstitutional rule: and for this reason, therefore, it is considered correctly applied by the Municipality of Lecce, not recognizing any violation of the principles of reasonableness and proportionality.

This, in practice, is the content of the decision of the Puglia TAR which rejected the appeal of the owner of a gaming room presented against the provision of the Municipality of Lecce which ordered, in a Ferreo way, the immediate termination of the installation of the appliances of Game, considered illegal, and put into operation without authorization and which also had the immediate closure of the room as it is located less than 500 linear meters with the so -called sensitive places. Certainly drastic measure, but supported and supported by the judgment of the judges of the Puglia TAR which deemed how much the provision imposed on the game room appeared "dutifully adopted and sufficiently motivated" especially in relation to the essential requirement of minimum distances from the sensitive places provided for for Each type of Game offer with money win From the aforementioned Pugliese regional law of 2013, currently in place.

But what is the most heart to the writer is above all that the Puglia Tar, after that of the province of Bolzano, does not recognize in the law on the Apulian game, "the invoked expulsive effect" which declares completely hidden. In addition to everything the same judges affirm and reiterate in their sentence that the need to protect sensitive interests towards the economic interests of the playful commercial activity that opposes the provision of the Municipality of Lecce prevail. In short, in practice, it is reiterated that it is not possible to place the headquarters of this game activity in the municipal territory from Lecce without "violating the distances referred to in the game on the game, functional to guarantee and protect the interests of vulnerable people": without hope, Consequently, the commercial future of the company that opposed the provision of closing its exercise by the Municipality.

There is no doubt that all these judgments do nothing but create uncertainty, confusion and perplexity and that from this descends, as it is right that it is, the absolute need to have a national reform that creates the conditions for having a fair, sustainable public game , homogeneous. Above all, a reform that no longer makes the game operators "jump on the chair when waiting for a decision of any judge to whom appeals are submitted to" clearly see "on how the current rules must be interpreted, pervaded by inadequacy. Another purpose of this long -awaited reform is that it also includes "serious" tools that can truly achieve the precise objective of contrasting the problematic game: and they are certainly not the distances. So what better occasion of the next administrative elections to finally keep the promise of the yellow-green executive and proceed with the drafting of the game reform that puts an end to this situation so critical for the public game?

It is obvious, and consequent to the approach of the administrative elections, that the mayors ask for more precise rules to the central government so that they can best carry out their mandate, given that in recent times the "doing" of local authorities (and of the regions) As far as the game is concerned, it is certainly not viewed by all those who participate firsthand in this world of gambling, managing small or medium -sized companies that would like to live and work in peace, but with more certainties. Therefore, even in this electoral round we will return to talk about gambling, the battle for its contrast, a topic that has now become a workhorse for almost all parties and inserted in all the campaigns. And again the initiatives will hold the initiatives to counter the phenomenon of the game with almost obsolete speeches because those put on the field in the previous elections will be resumed: only that, unfortunately, we always continue to speak and act just about it.

It may be, however, that "this period may finally be the right one" and that our current executive is able to take the opportunity to put representatives of the decentralized institutions in a position to be able to do their task well by having an extra weapon, as a law National on the game, which "would undoubtedly remove many chestnuts from the fire" and the mayors, also of the most advanced cities in the battle against the game, to act in the best way having a "national address" (finally) to which to appeal and referBut it is thought, however, that the government wants to be "in confusion" as regards the public game: perhaps to have the opportunity to bring this phenomenon "to excess" until public opinion (and therefore all citizens, Even those who manage a game company) will not accept any initiative that the central government will want to take towards the game and its insiders. Perhaps, so, it is about thinking badly but, as they say, "to think badly sometimes we hit us": but you would not like, certainly, that this was the opportunity to collect this old adage outside ...

Publication date: 11 May 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly