Perhaps the government plays on the skin of gambling

Honestly, the future of the world of gambling, and also that of Online casino with real money, seems to be sitting on a swing: one day the reorganization is promised, the other does not. One day no more taxation than that already happened, the next day no. So, it is not understood whether it is the executive (it does not matter what color it is) to play gambling with the same game, but also with its citizens. Because? First because the previous government, the yellow-green government to be clear, or wanted prohibition from the origin, to erase the game from the American area because it is immoral (but to give a sort of "sugar" with the entry on the market of the ban on the Advertising promised its reorganization), then the yellow-red one "insinuated" taxation increases, undoubtedly putting anguish throughout the game chain, but always promised its reorganization. Today, more recent voices, they no longer speak of reorganization, but they return to talk about tax increases on the public game to make ends meet, just to change, the next budget law: thus putting the state in a position to be "absolutely dependent" from resources of the playful sector.

And not only that: putting these future, probable resources to guarantee the European Commission. In practice, disavowing, but only in words as already happened with previous governments, of wanting to strongly resize the gamble, but in practice hoping that American citizens continue more and more to play to have more and more resources available. Rebus Sic Stantibus: game yes or play right? What does the yellow-red government really say while talking about a future of our economy, probably bluffing and risky in almost everything he says? So, again, we speak of new taxation, but not of the promise of his reorganization: that topic disappears from any speech of politics and today it can perhaps be said that he had been put on the plate just to give a "contentment" to the industry of I play when you have spoken precisely of new increases to be applied to the sector. If it is not a way of "absolutely risky" by the government, what could it be called?

Certainly, a clear and clear teasing of the entire supply chain that basically asks only having a livable, sustainable sector, useful for the professions that has managed to "invent", but undoubtedly a sector of the most taxed at European level. But, above all, a serious sector that is not forced to live with a legislation that overlaps and "duplicate" of the region in the region, and with that "territorial question" which is preventing the development of the entire supply chain because it does not allow the 'assignment of new concessions in any segment you look at. If, then, the spaces where new game posts can be placed are not delimited precisely, concessions and authorizations automatically cannot be issued. So is it the state that needs public game or the public game that needs the state?

Who knows if someone wants to respond to what a riddle might appear: and without a doubt it is, only that it is a truly tasteful and not very understandable riddle in the eyes and ears of the most. It is not that the executive, whatever it has been and whatever it will be, does a good impression on us (to use an understatement): it takes and resumes from the game and its resources, collects the figures for the concessions it releases and which they do not do today The more work and collect any playful commercial activities. So he speculates on the desire for the game of his citizens and gives absolutely nothing in return: not even he is committed, putting himself at the table, to reform the sector from which he has been drinking for years without stopping and for any imaginable reason. And then would it be the public game that is immoral? Or are those who continue to insist in the speech of wanting to limit the game to avoid (or rather to prohibit citizens) to get lost inside the entertainment equipment?

Anyone can understand that in doing so, probably, he goes and focuses more and more on the fact that the Americans turn to other games (perhaps at the state lottery of the receipt, because that certainly is not immoral), and so you always have Available revenues to make ends meet the state accounts that, who knows how, never quadrano. Other than discontinuity: the current executive proposes itself in perfect line with the previous ones and persevents to treat the world of public game always in the same way. But today, as he had just finished doing the previous government, he continues to play with the entire game industry, with his operators and with all his employees. Evidently those who should be interested in the very serious problem of employment, do not realize that they will now find themselves with a lot of people, former employees of small and medium -sized gaming enterprises, in the midst of a road precisely because of the state that allows application of regional "capestro" regulations that force those who belong to the "State Riserva" team to close their activities.

Who once again plays d'Azzardo? But with the future lives of these citizens who until yesterday were part of a flourishing sector that for years was indicated as the third economy of our country, which entered considerable resources in the praise of the Treasury, which produced jobs and that He made it look to USA as a nation that had the best organized public game sector and with a more than attractive market for foreign investors. Today, however, what do you see? A sector in the breakdown, legitimate game activities put in a corner in its territories, if not even expelled, an absolutely blocked market, and investors who "withdraw", after the beautiful thought of the ban on advertising to the games and the Betting And that they go to use their capital, always in the same sector of the game, but in other nations where gambling is not treated as in our country, somewhat retrograde, respectable and full of false moralism. Who plays d'Azzardo?

Publication date: 23 October 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly