Five Star Movement: new bill on the game

Who knows if some "small movement" in the policy of the Five Star Movement towards the contrast to the problematic game, it means "something" for the playful sector: always hoping that this does not translate, instead, in a sort of decree dignity that for that which concerns the gambling has the value of a "tangible tunnel" for many game companies, particularly for those operating in the sector of Best online casino. However, we could also hope, given this experience and the "economic disaster" to the sector that the prohibition will entail, that the five -star movement studies something "softer" and applicable national, especially something "favorable" to the game, albeit contrasting it The problems that can descend. In any case, we continue to repeat, like a mantra, which takes a greater knowledge of the risks that "the game" can hide when "its use" becomes "abuse". But here we are now evaluating what is contained in the bill of a MP of the Five Star Movement, a plan that particularly aims to fight gambling disorders.

And here you could open and close a parenthesis: perhaps at this point the Five Stars will not make the public game disappear "from the face of the earth", but they are accepting its presence and it could perhaps "be calm" on its future. He will still be present although put in a corner, tartinated and demonized, but of his "disappearance", if you activate on a bill, one could suspend that we talk about it. With this bill, the "measures to counteract the pathological gambling" are put at the center of the proposal, but unfortunately the reform of the sector and precise national regulations that the whole supply chain awaits is not put in the foreground. Among these measures still and inevitably appear the distanziometer, the limits to the operating times of the authorized game rooms, the penalties for the fight against illegal game, compliance with the limits for the exercise of the legitimate game and the provisions for prevention, the care and rehabilitation of the disorder from gamble.

The Penta-STELLATO parliamentary wants to focus its documents to counter the problematic game and evaluate what the results have been achieved with the measures up to here they have been adopted but before explaining its "objectives" underlines that it is not aware of the further measures that the yellow-green government has in mind to put in place. However, the objective that the parliamentarian himself wants to pursue and achieve to counteract the venture "arises from the observation that gambling is a social scourge that infested our cities and that involves the weakest bands of our society" (but which abundantly fills the praise of the tires). Also for this deputy, in any case, doubts arise relating to the contrast of the problematic game by means of the hourly limitations or with the closure of the exercises that offer the game products. The problematic game could be defeated if the development and employment conditions were affirmed in the country so that the players should not resort to this entertainment to solve daily economic problems, perhaps not working.

This is a great risk for those who approach the game in the hope of "changing their lives", and not for pure fun or entertainment: perhaps, the limitation of times could be a first step to avoid being "overwhelmed" by the mass of offers that He places himself in the eyes of those who seek the game. The offer is too present, both terrestrial and online, and a limitation will have to be taken into account, since there is still little information on what can be hidden in the "meanders" of the offers. It would also seem right that in a future national law there is uniformity as regards the times and game points, in order to make it easier for the player citizen to know how to meet "his favorite entertainment" without having to chase different opening times or openings, Maybe even in the same country! Having equality would mean protecting the health of citizens who would not be attacked by the anxiety of finding an open playroom in this or that place or one that is not.

This would not leave free hand in regulation to local authorities that often and willingly, for merely economic issues, issue "ad personam" regulations, if you can say so. And not only that: avoiding the installation of more restrictive rules, the use of the decisions of the various TARs would be avoided with a large expenditure of public money, as well as the game companies concerned. Another reflection is that with a certain and precise national regulation, one would be able to help even those who want to invest in this type of activity: instead, it is clear that with leopard stain regulations, the calls that So much expect to open other game paths that would help the market to be "more welcoming" and competitive. Inevitably then, in relation to this bill on the game, you must "enter" also in the speech of the Dignity Decree.

With the prohibition of advertising to the games it contains, the interests of the entire sector could be damaged and the economic contribution that the game sector conveys in the praise coffers would be at risk. In a free market, objectively, every entrepreneur should be protected for the freedom of business which, however, must not, in turn, harm the social. You should look at and make a comparison with what has been implemented for European automotive companies by the United States: they were sanctioned, and also heavily for the damage caused to the environment following the scandal linked to the false values ​​of the emissions engines. The other example is having suspended the advertising of cigarettes: of course, it did not make people stop smoking, however, it seemed a duty intervention to limit their damage. So it will happen for the game: the players will certainly not stop playing because they do it from the "mists of time", but a small contribution to decreasing the impulses perhaps will be able to reach.

Publication date: April 15, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly