Social responsibility and regulation of gambling

The protection of citizenship, for each state, must rise to absolute priority: in everything that moves around the citizen of every territorial reality. And this must also concern the relationship between the central state and the world of public game, Casino with real money Including, that must absolutely have a clear regulation that makes the population aware of what he meets when he plays and enjoys. Above all "must really have this regulation" and must be absolutely nationally, making all the American territory identical in the eyes of the new people of players who after Lockdown reappears in the game rooms, in the casino and which should also be compared with A game of new guise but even safer than the pre-coronavirus and which must be brought to you with the certainty of a public legal game, well reorganized and reformed. And this must be worth in all its segments, including that of bets that has always lend itself most to illegal interference, especially in the online game where monitoring and controls are more complicated for the management of the same network which is "somewhat elusive" null

In addition to everything, in this segment the scammers organize bets by distributing the relative dynamics on different countries so as not to be discovered: specific way by gravitating on the Asian markets that are not traceable and intercepted. For example: the event on which there are bets is played in Europe and the passage of money transits for Eastern Europe and these fragments inevitably make any investigation and interception activities improper and, for this reason, it would be fundamental Whether both the world of sport and sports organizations are aware of these dynamics: how, in practice, they take place and which risks expose themselves to the illegal market, even in an unconscious way. But, unfortunately, with the lack of awareness of their doing, they unconsciously feed the illegal system that continues to "swell exponentially of conspicuous revenues" which are subtracted from the lawful, regulated market and which pays taxes from the various governments.

But it seems that to date, and particularly in recent months, these phenomena are poorly known in most of the countries that are involved and this should always end for a matter of profound responsibility that the governments of the same territorial realities should have in comparisons of its citizens. It also seems evident that sports authorities such as the League, FIFA, and UEFA should insert much more rigid regulations governing the sponsorship dynamics, inserting in -depth provisions to evaluate the reliability of the subjects with which agreements are subscribed. A useful path to follow would be to know exactly who the shareholders of a specific sporting organization are, as has already been done for some time by the Dutch Federation, and a path that perhaps could also be applied to get to know more deeply a sponsor before concluding any contractAnd this always with the exclusive protection of players, the market and the legal companies that will then try their hand at Betting.

Certainly, it should be conscious that many dealers are entitled to do what they do in their field and, therefore, we must not be contrary to the sponsorships ends in themselves, since these initiatives could be an important "revenue" for the promotion of sport, such as Moreover, it already happens in many regulated markets. What needs to "osterome" from bets is the illegality that is dangerous both for the player, who perhaps ignoring risks playing with "incorrect" operators, but also for the legitimate companies themselves that are ousted from what could be their right one I earn. Providing to protect them and others should be a natural commitment of the central state with transparent regulations that protect the lawful public game. Unfortunately, there are many dynamics that come out of conventional patterns and that allow certain unscrupulous operators to operate by exploiting "holes and flaws" of the system to operate in unregulated markets.

It is clear that the regular market offers a different scenario, perhaps even less attractive: however, authorized operators should have the right to promote their legality within their market and for this reason the regulators must work even better to regulate the market of I play in a sustainable way, both from a fiscal and commercial and also operational aspect. If this is not achieved, you will risk helping the black market to grow even more by putting players absolutely at risk, but also the legal companies and the sport involved. Unfortunately, making the discussion of the promotion of the work of the dealers of gamble It is inevitable that the dignity decree that is creating serious problems for operators is inevitable because it prevents them from communicating directly with its customers, as prevents the communication of the same game for those who love this sector: the promotion of the responsible game and the forms of protection of the same players. As is doubtful that advertising is useful to make the legal game recognize from what it is not, which appears to be indispensable to many.

But for the dignity decree, it is not like that: therefore, our market most likely comes out penalized and perhaps it would be time to run for cover also because only advertising can bring to the attention of the consumers of the game the existence of those submerged markets of which has been written above, since this news is still not aware of many citizens. On the other hand, in the communication by the dealers there was the obligation to promote the responsible game, this activity that with the dignity decree is compromised and interrupted by the prohibition of advertising that must be revised and modified to allow this delicate dialogue with consumers null Obviously there must be so much transparency in these communications and perhaps even times to spread promotional messages, but you cannot continue to keep communications interrupted for a long time through a sort of prohibition imposed on advertising tout court and which cannot be considered one Solution and which contributes, however, to create further distortions on a market like that of the game already quite delicate.

Publication date: August 17, 2020 at 17:27

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly