The war against the world of gambling has tightened

In recent years, and honestly we continue to ask why this happens and in favor of who or what, the war against the world of public game, and also against All online casinos, he exacerbated himself: particularly, then, with the advent of this yellow-green government that never hides his aversion to the playful sector, his businesses and his operators. The game, therefore, continues to represent, for our American politics, a sort of taboos to such an extent almost as to trigger a race to those who think and put the most restrictive rules and beyond. We even come to propose amendments that by saying "strange" it almost seems to use an understatement, because they go to "praise illegality" rather than safeguard legality: just go against the game. It does not matter that the same is “sought after by a part of supporters who see in this entertainment a healthy and peaceful fun.

Therefore, one must even attend in Parliament, which unfortunately does not escape the rules of "no azzardo-no Slot machine", At the presentation of amendments such as the one we are telling in these lines that makes" shiver "and that suggests that the state is setting off the coup de grace to the world of public game, which in addition to everything represents it: gaining public opinion and continuing in the battle against "the immorality" of the same game and its representatives. But, we want to return to the amendment presented to the decree of which we "like" disquisition to make some (irreverent as they are sardonic) laugh. We refer to the part of the law in which the cases of exclusion from the income of citizenship are listing and, precisely, when it is said: "the omitted communication of change of income, even if deriving from the performance of irregular work" (subject to the imprisonment from two to six years) should be replaced with "even if from sums collected with the legal or illegal game".

This truly constitutes an "authentic masterpiece" in favor of the submerged economy and, if the Senate should never approve a change of this type, one could undoubtedly say that it would be a "truly paradoxical passage". In the text, an honest citizen who was traced to spend money made available by the State through the income of citizenship in a game product, owned by the state, would be punishable as an undue appropriation of public money and would lose, In any case, the right to receive that contribution because it is incompatible with shopping in games: by canceling, with the approval of this "reckless" amendment, the basic forecast that was to hit another type of citizen, this certainly dishonest, which continues to perceive the income of citizenship despite having other "black" entries, because they are coming from irregular activities.

Isn't that this path an absurd paradox does not represent this path? Obviously, it is hoped that a modification of this type can never pass because otherwise "there would really be something wrong" in the head of our American politics and in those who "frequent it and put it in place". Something hidden that you cannot perceive well, but that certainly goes towards the goal of putting the field any legislation that fills the game of innocent and harassment. Nothing else comes to mind. Perhaps that this amendment, as expressed, is the son of a mere mistake by his signatories, especially since one of these there is a former public prosecutor who should "understand" irregular and criminal activities! But what do all these dissertations lead to, in practice? They lead to increase the concern that once again the game is treated with a superficiality not worthy of good politics, with inattention and perhaps also with a sort of indifference: and to think that the game represents an industry that guarantees a significant level of employment, It represents the third national economy and, undoubtedly, a high amount of tax revenues to which no government, of any color, seems to be able to give or want to give up.

In addition to what has been said, one still wants to underline why in the expenses forbidden by the income of citizenship the game appears, but not the consumption of alcohol: this, in fact, is not there but must not be amazed because this is our country e our policy. The debate that concerns it is so exacerbated and contaminated by false myths and conditioned by this phantom witch hunt that has polarized towards the world of games, and also to the world of Online betting, that we even get to the formulation of laws such as that of which we are talking about and proposals for modification to the same that seem truly ridiculous if they did not touch a sector that, due to this way of doing politics, has been brought to its knees. It is to be hoped that the amendment that is acting as a flywheel to this article is an isolated case: but in our hearts you know, unfortunately, that it will not be so and who knows how much.

It seems, however, that our policy is pervaded by a widespread obsession for the game that pushes to insert more restrictive measures and that have the aim of demonstrating to the public opinion that the central government "cares about" the citizen and His health, almost passing over everything else. And this is made by forgetting to verify the applicability of the rules put in the field as well as the sustainability of the same or without even evaluating their consistency or inconsistency, as for the amendment that we wanted to report and which still leaves us " stunned ". What is certain is that all this superficiality represents a kind of political malpractice increasingly present among its representatives when we speak, in particular, of the game: but who knows if an attitude of the genre could have occurred towards other sectors such as that of cars, or ships or oil or, in any case, of any other industry that has "economic weight" for our beautiful country.

Publication date: March 2, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly