Still attempts to dismantle legal gambling

With all this bailmme of ordinances of both the central government by DPCM and the regions, it is undoubtedly difficult to follow its provisions: too many rules, close and consequent. It is not time to acquire one that after two days, or even less, another appears: certainly, we understand the emergency situation that does not give peace and that must be followed carefully and also the consequent "doing" of the institutions to stem The contagion that does not seem to agree on stopping neither in our country nor in other territorial realities. The virus continues in its devastating course that today more than ever suggests, unfortunately, a next total lockdown pre -warning it with many mini lockdown that are raging from north to south of the boot following the considerations of the regions that want to protect their territories having this " hot potato ”in hand, launched by the central government. But, if of course, it is everyone's task to make sure that pandemic can be limited, where everyone is "formally responsible" by the government in limiting their movements, one cannot fail to notice that the games sector, including the Best American Legal Sites of Casino, it is always that world that is hypocritically looking for to destroy.

And it is done by applying a disparity of treatment to its companies in the face of other activities that involve a greater risk in keeping them with open doors. It is not that the public game always complains: it is that every time an order is made, in any territory, the first ones that are affected, and above all discriminated against, are the playful activities as happened in the first Lockdown to which it was imposed An early closure, at the time of the appearance of the emergency, and an extension not justified compared to other undoubtedly risky activities. It does not seem justified that only and always the game sector, regardless of the investments made to adapt to the requested safety protocols, must be the only one to be penalized with the immediate closure despite having characteristics that make it more controlled than other activities.

In addition, of course, which is to be kept very well in mind for the safety of citizens and the territory, which with the closure of the legal game is left the territory at the "complete provision of the illegal game" which prospectively thrives on you in spite of state concessions and legal operators null We find ourselves today after having "digested" ordinances containing different decisions based on the territories, with the public game again "stop at the pole" and put in conditions of not being able to obtain a "drawer not even sufficient to return investments" that have been carried out to reopen and for a very short time. Then, after the two DPCM of 13 and 18 October which left a little breath at game activities, albeit conditioned by a compatibility assessment with the territory reserved exclusively for the regions, we confront a total block of playful activities, albeit not supported by any adequately motivated evaluation and that configure them responsible for an increase in the s.

If it is not discrimination and want to deliberately sink a sector, how would you like to call it? And above all what we are talking about: when there is to "stop" someone inevitably thinks first of all to stop public game and his legal companies. While other sectors are left open and also protected and supported by institutional resources, which obviously does not happen, even in the slightest part, to the game industry that cannot take advantage of the layoffs albeit "authorized" (on paper, but not in substance) also for the playful sector, to which, however, it cannot arrive. And who knows why. In any case, even today it is not possible to understand with what criterion the "institutional darkness" on the world of games and of the sport bets Although the central government stressed that there must be compatibility between activities and epidemiological trend in the area. Has the public game demonstrated something contrary?

The sector does not seem and honestly "we would like" to know the reasons that have "fomented" a decision on the total closure so explicit towards the world of games: or is it wondering too much? The central government with its attitude, in addition to not providing any element of evaluation to support the diversity of treatment reserved for public game, inserting the closure of the games in the DPCM almost tends to demonstrate that these activities represent a dangerous scope of spreading the contagion. And above all that the guidelines, that the game activities follow slavishly, are not adequate to contain the contagion. This is truly unacceptable also because the activities of the other sector remain open that are less controllable than the playful ones, which should be explained to the experts of the game and the poker: otherwise one should really think that real treatment of treatment are applied which, then, translate into clear discrimination for the world of games.

And at this point it is certainly not possible to avoid thinking that in a state of law legal companies that act on behalf of the State by means of concessions, they must continue to suffer these rapant attempts at "dismantling", not even well hidden, behind the sanitary emergency. It really looks like a well preordained plan to carry on the battle that for some time a part of the executive fights towards the public game and that rise every time the opportunity presents itself. It means false moralism, respectability and ethical choices that we insist on flaunting, albeit without any support or evaluation that attests how negative the gambling is compared to much more serious addictions such as alcohol, drugs or smoking of the Which speaks, but not with the real awareness that these topics would certainly require. Who knows why the phenomenon of the game and deviances that this can cause is always ride: they almost never quantify the percentages of fatal accidents that causes drugs or alcohol. Because?

Publication date: November 8, 2020 at 16:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly