United Kingdom: the four political addresses towards the game

More and several times from these lines it has been stressed that the phenomenon of gambling, and also that of Legal Casino sites, does not concern exclusively our country in which it has scattered with wildfire, but has become a choice of entertainment embraced by many users both visitors of the terrestrial one and those projected in the online game. Consequently, politics in general is interested in this topic that involves many people and concerns a sector that must be kept under control very well so that it cannot cause difficult drifts, once triggered, to be addressed and contrast. In our country, like those who still read us, the public game is not seen particularly well by the recent executive who on the one hand would like to see it completely disappear, but on the other as repeatedly, he has an absolute necessity of his revenues: therefore , the playful sector lives in this total uncertainty and little respect that lead it to many difficulties in addition to the demonization that makes it perceive as a "public danger" for the social.

In other realities, however, gambling is "alive and well", albeit perhaps controlled even more rigid than in our country, but is lived differently from the social way. In these lines we want to "tell" what has happened in these days in the United Kingdom for the elections that have been held and also wants to list what the various politicians intend to do towards gambling, sector in that reality well lived, well regulated and also where its resources are well exploited in the interest of the population. British politics can be divided, if you can say this, into four sectors: conservatives, Labor, liberal-democrats, Scottish national party and everyone has something to say about the game and, perhaps, suggest new interventions to make it even more sustainable or more Controllable: In short, even in the United Kingdom, despite being at the forefront in this sector and and for example, for other regulators it is thought to be improved. Here is what the various groups submit even if with the outcome of the elections perhaps the politicians will have much more important problems than gamble (as consequences) and Brexit turns out to be an actuality that will absorb them completely.

In addition to everything, it is clear that the scenario of the whole world of British game could change in total way: In any case, however, we "like" browse in the intentions of the different parties. The success of the conservatives will undoubtedly lead them to implementing what they promised not to discontented those who supported them: the game program, leaving other initiatives for the United Kingdom, which, at the moment, do not want to face, It is to totally review the legislation in place in the gambling, with a particular regard to the grip of credit cards. This intervention was warmly advocated by the intervention of the Gambling Commission and, therefore, absolutely to follow. Then the intention of the conservatives is to intervene also in the regulation of the loot boxes, the famous much discussed prize speakers since they are accused, not according to the writer, of being harmful and of draging the minors fearfully towards gambling.

The "natural" opponents of the conservatives, the Labors also ridden the topic of the game, promising that in case of victory (which did not actually materialize) they would have intervened in putting limits on the game, but in particular they would be Applied in initiatives aimed at the prevention and care of the problematic game by addressing, however, this problem at the level of intervention for public health and making more forces available precisely for this specific dependence. In the United Kingdom, gambling is followed by many people and for this reason the Labor had set themselves a serious vine lap in relation to the sponsorships of the betting operators. The sector of football clubs in relation to Betting It is a phenomenon that has been "attached" from this political part that seems to have been inspired by our Dignity Decree as regards, of course, the notorious ban on advertising to games and bets. It is hoped with better outcome than what is happening in our country and, above all, with more transparent and impossible rules.

The liberal-democrats, the third political faction of the single kingdom, had promised to ban credit cards in the election campaign as regards the online game and they too had expressed themselves in severe terms against the limitation to advertising of the companies they deal with Gambling: they have put the protection of minors and the bands of the weaker and influenceable subjects at the center of their program, but also the introduction of a compulsory tax to be paid by all operators in the games sector, amounts that should serve to finance the activities of contrasting the problematic and compulsive game. To close the political scenario, you also want to report to the last initiative for the game put in place by the Scottish National Party which spent a part of its "campaign" in desifying the autonomy in defining local regulations on the game (perhaps what which resembles our "territorial question"), to be implemented also with the appointment of an "independent" regulator.

The Scottish party also expressed themselves on the need to put in place greater attention to the problematic game and the consequences of the already mentioned Loot Boxes who do not finish discussing and of which we also speak here in our country carefully, considering that they are " projected "towards minors and their entertainment. The Scottish also committed themselves to supporting the idea of a withdrawal on operators to undertake initiatives against the problematic game. At the end of these lines what can be added? There is a risk of being trivial but it seems that the phrase that most suits this topic can be: "The whole world (of the game) is a country": for the good of the playful sector it is hoped that in the United Kingdom, however, i Fact and not the words as happens in our country and that it is not exclusively of pre-electoral promises!

Publication date: January 3, 2020 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly