Is there someone in favor of the game advertising stop?

There is someone who believes that the Dignity Decree, and particularly the prohibition on advertising to Casino his internet Which contains, it was not thought and put in place to indiscriminately affect the public game, and therefore lawful, but to promote awareness and responsibility. And since "every head is a small world" we would like to try to study this point of view even enough away from the thought of almost all of those who love this world of games and who towards that measure nourish serious doubts about his goal: Destabilize, and not a little, the whole game industry and its operators. The point of view of those who support, today, the prohibition of advertising to the games and bets is that the provision is a "beautiful signal given by the government" to deal with the phenomenon of ludopathy "situation which, without a doubt, brings both personal discomfort for Those who are involved and overwhelmed, both for the family area and, finally, for the working one.

According to the supporters of the ban, this intervention of the yellow-green executive was indispensable as an act of strength and to give a clear political address: but on this there were not many doubts given its declared aversion externalized in more and more opportunities. And it should not even be forgotten that a "similar" bill had already been presented in the legislature last by the parliamentarians of the League. In any case, the fact that studies, research, reflections and deductions have outsternated the thought that the total bans, as expressed by the dignity decree, remain to hit many other sectors who "work with the game", such as the Betting on sport, but above all it seems to be shown that they do not have the effect that this prohibition would like to concretize: indeed they increase, perhaps, the "desire to play" and the possibility of incurring the illegal game that has neither rules, nor distanziometers, nor times.

And what about the online game that can always be achieved, and wherever you are? Segment that in particular will be confronted with this prohibition that will put in crisis the companies that operate there and, above all, those companies that have yet to make a "customer portfolio" that should build themselves through advertising: the only way to make themselves known online , while "earth" companies can take advantage of the "real view" of the game points. But what is most interested is the result that can be obtained towards the problematic and compulsive game and you should resort to the deductions that have been "communicated" by the research institutes to which studies have been commissioned in this sense: pity that the executive Yellow-green of these results seems to have not taken into account, or it seems to have underestimated them, otherwise this put in place of the total ban would not be explained to the advertising of the games that is making so much discussion, but to which for the moment the game industry He will have to "obey".

The phenomenon of ludopathy is a complex phenomenon that, objectively, cannot be fought with a ban, but only with culture and information: and this if you want to draw "experience" by those who previously applied "absolute prohibitions" in others fields and in other sectors. The fact remains that for years the public game has been legalized, first to make cash and to remove the revenues from the illegal game that "did it in those times as master" and then, in fact, to counter the same that was expanding More and more and brought critical issues in the territories (as well as removing these resources to the central state): thus, year after year, we found ourselves with "too much game offer" present on the American territory, driven and promoted for all circumstances. And the thing escaped from hand to the central government, holder of the public game, who was represented by concessions by the operators who became "State of State" and proposed this business to citizens.

We found ourselves with too much offer of the public product and with the lack of strength by the various executives, to face this situation: hence the "long and inexplicable hiding" of the State who has also granted its decentralized institutions to issue ordinances on ordinances to try to stem this phenomenon. We therefore arrive at the current days where this (initial) proof of strength of the two sides that governs the country to contrast The world of games, hitting it in the part that advertises it. But that this can be useful to combat ludopathy remains everything to be demonstrated even if the right -thinking carry on this speech that is absolutely not shared by most of the people who love the playful sector. What the mind of those who play should keep in mind, always and in any case, is that the game is healthy entertainment and there is absolutely no "bad" if you risk a small amount of money to throw it into the lot, the bingo and even the Machines ... but it must remain a game and, of course, it is not wrong.

The problem arises when the same becomes an addiction and involves too much the individual, his way of being and the world that surrounds him: and it is here that awareness and responsibility must take over, but certainly not the prohibitions. It would be useful to look at alcohol and smoke addictions that have been positively "correct" by the advertising on the damage they can procure and which, in the end, led to a decrease in their negative percentages. But information campaigns and non -demonizers were made: advertising aimed at the public who used it, trying to make the risks were made, without declaring that alcohol or smoke "were immoral and that they were therefore swept away by the American territory". To pull a line and to make a budget of the total prohibition on advertising, it could be said that perhaps, not even the phenomenon of ludopathy, or problematic game, or compulsiveness will be able to draw any benefit: but to "posterity the arduous sentence" of all that will happen.

Publication date: January 18, 2019 at 14:22

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly