Confusion in the game: so illegality takes hold
The actors of the world of gamble Public are many: the state, local authorities, regions, players, companies, operators as well as the offer of the game product, the risks of the problematic game, or even compulsive, and finally the criminal infiltrations in the sector. Without a doubt, to grant all this is not an easy undertaking and today's result is certainly not what could be represented in reality if the advent of a national reorganization, homogeneous and undoubtedly more balanced that would allow it to be concretized that would allow in A somewhat probable way "a better commercial life". Instead, we intervene with multiple prohibitional forms almost to ban the legal game, forcing the "good and bad" players to move to the suburbs, on the borders of the cities, where there are already other social problems and greater delinquency. Marginality and ghettoization are not a right policy, unfortunately, but it is the choice that has been made to date by our good politics.
"Hide" the phenomenon of play in the suburbs seems to be a somewhat dangerous speech: it would be much better and even more deeply wise, to be able to enhance the education and culture of the game in schools with young people and apply in the strategies of the prevention of the disorder playing with an active collaboration to be established with the Serd. Without forgetting the game of the future, i Best online casino, which exists above all already abundantly today and, therefore, in the present: In the Oonline, then, the market is destined to be increasingly broad and, evidently by its own nature, it can never be controlled with physical measures. Even putting tools intended "to the contrast of problematic game" such as distanziometers, it was found to be penalizing only for operators, instead of contributing to the shattering of the phenomenon of gambling. And not only that: the continuous increases in the tax burden that the various governments have imposed on the game have only depleted the sector, made companies close, pushing today more than ever the illegal game to flourish on a market that the lawful game is forced to abandon null The consequence is that the public game is defeated.
Luckily in this set of measures beyond negative way, there is also some "voice out of the choir", some region (and seem more and more) that has committed themselves to postponing the application of the distanziometer, since it realized how much Negative impact this tool could determine for legal companies and, above all, for the employment, which the latter that already represents a significant problem in our country. At this point, it would be important with the recent change of government, to alarm the institutions on the return of organized crime as "manager of the illicit game". To safeguard the territory from this illegal game, they need transparent and effective rules to support the operators who remained to represent the legitimate offer of the game with their state concessions. Obviously, the fight against illegal game must become a priority, in particular for the health of citizens who with the crime too present in the territories run risks, but to safeguard the legitimate sector of the game and the Betting And also to fight against organized crime that makes the game not very transparent and, therefore, dangerous for users.
It becomes inevitable, however, to underline that the contrast to illegality is achieved with greater checks, with the transparency of the organization and the distribution of games and, certainly, not with prohibitions or with the increase in the taxation of the legal game. To succeed in this contrast path, what has not happened has not happened so far: a constructive comparison. Comparison that must be among all the actors that has been spoken at the beginning, politics, institutions, operators and local authorities to be able to put in white harmonic rules that comply with international standards and also that make you stand out and balance the needs both of the protection of the order in the territory and of public health. This should deliver the survival of the American game, which was held in high consideration and considered a model at European level until a couple of years ago: return to this, it would be essential also by virtue of a possible movement of the market in this sector which is Too far and for too long.
We are sure that the static nature of the recreational sector in our country is to be attributed to the prohibition and also "slightly schizophrenic" approaches of our regulator which is preventing an important industry in the numbers and revenues that pay in the praise of the Treasury, to continue on its path which is to represent legality on our territory. Today, with the continuous restrictive regulations, and all the other tinsels put in the field, a great misunderstanding was created towards this sector and makes the same dynamics as the game industry rather nebulous, while it has been widely shown that of this industry , and above all of its positive results, the government needs, and how, and everything must therefore be clearer and transparent.
It is all too evident that from these reflections it emerges, in a clear and absolutely unequivocal way, how indispensable it is to reach a reorganization of all the legislation on public game. Rules that provide for a reduction of the entire game offer, perhaps also linked to the agreement signed in the unified conference, already in September 2017, and which was completely ignored. A reorganization that should establish, once and for all, the role of local authorities so that they can plan a distribution of the game carefully on the territory of competence: this is for the game points and the offer of the product in order to avoid excessive concentrations. However, the tool of distances could also be inserted without "emphasizing it too much" and perhaps following the criteria that follow each other with the retailers of tobacco. Even the decisions on the times should be the most homogeneous possible and should be coordinated with the involvement of the Customs and Monopolies Agency, with the Police Headquarters and the Guardia di Finanza, those authorities that are responsible for the controls of the game points.
Publication date: November 19, 2019 at 12:00
casino | Review | Visit |
---|---|---|
888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500 |
Visit | |
Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $ |
Visit | |
LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$ |
Visit | |
Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$ |
Visit | |
Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
Starcare 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $ |
Visit | |
william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$ |
Visit | |
Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $ |
Visit | |
Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300 |
Visit | |
Want to win 100% up to $ 1000 |
Visit | |
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly |