Calabria: a comparison between the region and entrepreneurs of the game
We do not understand the motivation for which with the associations that assist gaming companies, and of Casino sites, and the institutions are unable to entertain a sliding and above all useful comparison to get to the lens of having a sustainable and profitable game for everyone. It is not even understood if the various regions have taken inspiration from the hiding of the central government, which for a long time actually and really does not have relationships with the world of game and its companies, before making important decisions that have gone to impoverish more and more The playful sector. In fact, the absolute lack of relationships before the issuance of the notorious dignity decree with the prohibition of advertising to the games that the same contains: None of the supply chain or no association has been asked, no one has therefore been able to contrast their point of view and the needs of companies. Thus the government put in place what it deemed appropriate, not taking into account, in the most absolute way, of the interests of the game and of what negatively could have happened throughout the sector.
Then, surely (but you would also like it in current times), the game would have liked to deal with the institutions before a prohibition prohibition such as the one wanted by the Deputy Prime Minister of the M5S who expressed his thoughts towards the world with that provision of the gamble (public and lawful). Considering this speech, one might think that some regional authorities have taken that example so as not to confront the game in the management of the related territories: here we would like to talk about the Calabria Region where the relationships between the institutions and the game are almost null And now any comparison seems impossible. One could start from the declarations issued by a regional councilor: "The game law must be respected, but I am left only in this battle ..." and only these few words give the meaning of what has been said in the previous lines. Unfortunately, "a battle" is believed to be any initiative to be interpreted towards the public game: what if we start from this concept how can you think of obtaining a comparison?
According to the opinion of Sapar, an association always on the front line for the protection and defense of the world of game and the companies that represents with force and with stubbornness from north to south of our boot, it is believed that with the Calabria Region they cannot be Make steps forward for a positive comparison: unfortunately, it seems to be considered that the game travels with the arm with the mafia organizations and that, consequently, in addition to fighting and battling the latter, at the same level, one should also intervene towards the game of gambling. We do not "schioda" from this concept that blocks any intervention you want to propose and any confrontation you want to place: and for this reason the playful sector on that territory is stopped. But not only that: almost you get to "threaten" to knowing that if you want a confrontation "first (sapar), she must enforce the distanziometer from the game instead of fomenting the violations".
Certainly an unhappy phrase, since those who know even just a little the world of game know what Saar's seriousness is and their way of setting themselves at all the various administrations: this association "does not foste" nobody, in the most absolute way. In fact, Saar has only underlined how much the current regional law on the game in Calabrian territory, considered by that state -of -the -art regional councilor, does not achieve any realistic objective for the fight against problematic game, but not even a solution for the contrast of illegalityBy now, it is tried again that the same illegality prosperous precisely where there is no presence of the legal game, which represents the offer of state products, and therefore lawful. In the end, Saar did not say anything new because from many sides it is stated that the famous distanziometers are useless as regards the disincelivation of the player, indeed they almost have the opposite effect: they put anxiety and anguish and force almost the player to chase your drives even more.
In principle, the institutions, albeit recently, seems to have recorded a certain availability towards trade associations: with the Calabria Region, unfortunately, it is not so, and this makes it clear that in politics there can be no consequentiality And what is sometimes promised, then it is not possible to concretize and is the result of a mere "set of words" that first make a sort of unity of intent whales but which then, also following political changes, vanish in a " Nothing done ”that certainly does not leave room for comparisons. In the case of the Calabria Region, it can also be confirmed that the current regional law on the game has introduced a form of completely anachronistic prohibition that will inevitable to encourage illegality on a territory that already has many problems.
A reflection should also be carried out in relation to the tens of thousands of $ of fines, high due to the presence of illegal slots: this confirms the presence of the illegality that is said to fight with the regional law on the game and which, instead, has the effect to put only the lawful commercial activities out of the game and with their respective authorizations. What to say, then, of the application of the distanziometer for the game appliances, Slot machine Excluded, which do not provide money in money such as flipper, football-balilla or video games? The same distanziometer is a real own goal for the Calabrian territory: Sapar underlines all these negativity in the regional law of Calabria exclusively because the goal of this association is to safeguard the investments of small and medium -sized gambling companies that the administration It seems to have put in the oblivion. Over six thousand jobs should be guaranteed that the recreational sector occupies on that territory, but without forgetting to support the contrast to the problematic game in full collaboration with the Serds that deal with the problem, but through actions and strategies that meet everyone's needs : companies, players, territory.
Publication date: November 10, 2019 at 12:00
casino | Review | Visit |
---|---|---|
888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500 |
Visit | |
Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $ |
Visit | |
LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$ |
Visit | |
Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$ |
Visit | |
Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
Starcare 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $ |
Visit | |
william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$ |
Visit | |
Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $ |
Visit | |
Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300 |
Visit | |
Want to win 100% up to $ 1000 |
Visit | |
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly |