Gambling: the fight against institutions continues

By now, for a couple of years between the institutions and the world of games, including the American mess, there is a bloody battle which, unfortunately, is dragging the whole playful sector and its businesses: many speeches and many broadcasts, many initiatives and also many measures put in place exclusively addressed to the segment of entertainment equipment that are considered by the government Central, and therefore cascaded by all other decentralized institutions, the "plague of the century" and as such must be treated. If there is any impedimental provision to study, and some other increase in taxation to be applied, it is not even reflected: it is gravitated on this sector which, among other things, represents an important part of the turnover of the games on the national territory and, Probably, even the one most sought after by citizens-citizens. Even today we ask ourselves why there is this clear aversion when it is precisely the same segment that gives the most income to the eratory coffers and allows the various executives to be able to draw on its resources "with full hands and, above all, without any Remora pseudo-moralistic ".

The public game, in reality, should be all the same: since it is not at all said that the appliances such as slots and VLT are the carriers par excellence of the problematic game, while the well -known "Scratch and win"They are absolutely harmless, because this is absolutely not true, as the same is to be attributed to the lot or to the Superenalotto. There are people who have also lost with these games. On the other hand, when returning to gambling disorder it is like giving in any other dependence, from alcohol to smoking, to drugs, each with their own gravity. Therefore, all games should be seen equally: all games should be taxed with the same criterion, otherwise only the slots and the VLTs will remain, called by the respectable "the Mets Mangiarasoldi", the only recipients of the continuous increases in taxation And this continues to be a mystery. It is therefore hoped that a national reorganization, which the sector anxiously expects, also puts an end to this.

Perhaps, to get to the reorganization of the games, one could start with a comparison table between the sector and the institutions hoping that soon the designation of a Undersecretary may be, such as Pier Paolo Baretta of good memory which in unified conference has tried to find a common agreement, which still lacks to date. Today, it absolutely seems indispensable to have a direct interlocutor to whom to be able to submit the needs, doubts and uncertainties of the public game: and which are certainly not few. "We like it", to think that we arrive at least with a certain speed because the game activities do not have all this time to wait: they must be able to solve the problems that are coming to endanger them and with them also the possibility of being able to Pour those taxes that the current executive are expected to arrive in the praise of the Treasury. As we "like" also to think that someone of the executive arrives "to turn on the light in the mind of the game" and clarify the motivation of this continuous and applied aversion to the Slot machine.

Perhaps, however, the explanation is simpler than you can think: the executive tax the appliances because they are the "most requested and used by the players" and those who can give greater "income for the eratory coffers", but Certainly not because they are the only ones who lead to the pathology of the game. Only, therefore, for a clear and mere question of state profit that always hides the passages of the executive when it comes to confronting the world of public game that represents, in any case, the state by means of concessions. Unfortunately, this speech, honestly, is becoming almost a mantra, almost obsolete and almost too repetitive. But since the state does not desist to squeeze only a certain segment of the game, the game on its part can only contrast the same topic: the game is treated, now without any hesitation, just like an ATM. Of its various needs, it doesn't matter, as it also matters even less than the dismissal of employees.

This is reality and with this the game industry will have to continue confronting each other until, finally, the national reorganization that would put a firm point, from which to objectively start again, and make programs in the future, will finally appear on the horizon, and That with the reform, it could really represent the present for all the companies that insist on wanting to deal with public game and continue to be a "reserve of state". Another point from which it could start again the whole world of games It could be represented by taxation on the drawer since this, most likely, would harmonize all the sectors. And what, above all, that the game has been requesting for a long time and that it had already been taken into consideration in 2017 during the unified conference, but a topic no longer followed, considered how the relationships from institutions has developed since that year e public game. Without forgetting that this type of taxation has already been examined by other foreign realities.

Perhaps, that type of taxation would bring out a particular fact: the VLTs that have a greater impact on an economic level rather than the AWPs with which "the coins" and many other inconsistencies would perhaps have ended. And so you could reflect, and without a doubt it would make you stand out, an abnormal behavior of the tax tax, i.e. that the average annual income of one VLT It's seven times greater than an AWP: so? Thus does not appear that it should be taken different paths and review a little better? Perhaps, at least, the taxation between these two segments could be equated: it would already be a success, albeit small but of great impact, at least for the operators who operate there. It is clear that what would be the optimal would be harmonizing the taxation between all forms of play with the suggested method of progressiveness on the profit.

Publication date: 12 January 2020 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly