By now each region has its own game law

That of the "territorial question" is undoubtedly an old discourse! It has been talked about (and unfortunately only that) for a few years now and there have been many "attempts to intervene" not least that of the unified conference that should have "seen clearly" on the problem and, instead, has only attributed even more powers Strong to local authorities and regions that continue to "dominate" how and when they want without the central government intervening in any way, admitted then that it wants to do it. So, game companies, e The best American online casino platforms, they still have to continue to confront this "territorial problem" that almost leaves no more space for playful activities together with the increases in taxation, calls postponed and undoubtedly with a reduction in commercial possibilities on the markets. Unfortunately, it has come to the point that each region has a "its own game law" tendentially prohibition where in some territories more than in others, they are imposing themselves so limited that they border on the expulsion of playful activities. In short, beyond the countless restrictions imposed on the world of games, the "territorial question" is still what represents a truly crucial node that should necessarily "dissolve".

Those who are following the path of the public game a little will remember that the territorial question started about eight years ago from the province of Bolzano where the first total opposition had been found to enter the public game on that territory, and it had arrived today Almost to ban it and put it on the margins of that market: all in a more than decisive and firm way. Since then the territorial solution, both from Bolzano and the rest of USA, does not seem "exactly at hand", especially after the pronouncement of the last days of the Council of State relating to the law of the province of Bolzano. In fact, although the presentation of a more than wide scientific documentation has been submitted, certifying the absolute ineffectiveness of the various distancines and the limitations of the lighting times of the game appliances and the Slot machine Compared to the lens of the contrast to the problematic game, the courts absolutely differ from these research and results. Just as the Council of State specifically.

It was considered that "although extremely restricted", the residual space in the area is sufficient for public game and it was considered not "the expulsive effect". The applicants in that area had always spoken of substantially total ban, that is, in some cases of 99% and in others of 96%, but the judge who issued the ruling, did not consider to take into account these real ban percentages and has , on the other hand, positively assessed "the results of the technical consultant who expressed himself with 95% as regards the ban on the territory, instead of in 99% indicated by the applicants. As if the percentage of 95% of the territory on which the prohibition of existence of the public game exists cannot compare itself to a "expulsive effect"! This "percentage" above is also accompanied by the restrictions on the installations of the appliances, on the opening and maintenance of the game rooms, as well as by the discipline of the ignition and shutdown times that the various municipalities exercise.

But since when it comes to public game "it is never enough", here after the pronunciation of the Council of State another "negative" verdict arrived, this time of the Milan Tar, relating to the operating hours: sentence that, if possible, makes the scenario even darker for The world of game I publish, thus closing a really bad week for the playful sector. The sentence, while taking into account the documentation produced in support of the lack of results against the problematic game, concludes in rejecting the appeal for the control of the ignition and shutdown times, claiming that with the suspension of the provision of the game, it is obtained there 'effect of "reducing the pathologies related to the game". Therefore, we are faced with a sentence issued with motivation linked only to the "common feeling" and putting into practice another "regulatory absurd potential": but, evidently, not according to the judges of the Milan Tar that have thus expressed themselves. What can I say: two sentences and two "blows" for the world of games and above all two rulings that will put the "territorial question" and the powers of local authorities and regions and the provinces again.

It cannot be said that these verdicts leave the game quiet: quite the opposite. If this well -known question is apparently forgotten for a few moments, it always resurfaces until the decentralized institutions will have this immense power that was attributed to them by the agreement that came out of the infamous unified conference, signed by all the participants, implemented only for what "It was convenient for the regions and municipalities" and, moreover, then unknown. A great mess of which the consequences are still being paid also because the government of change does not seem to want to take this "boiling potato" of the public game reform in hand. He continues to announce it, and not least in the issue of the Dignity Decree that with the prohibition of the advertising that includes is creating many problems in the sector and many will still create them to come.

But a national reorganization, unquestionably, is becoming essential: perhaps, however, this necessity only hear the game companies and its operators. On the other hand, the game chain continues to request the intervention by the yellow-green executive to get to the reform, the operators continue to manifest with the trade associations that assist them to be heard and to submit to the government the Impossibility of continuing to survive commercially, companies would like a meeting with the central institution to discuss the continuous taxation to which they are subjected, many resources would like to be sure of their future: but everything is silent. Both the executive and in particular the Minister of Labor and Economic Development: therefore, what should be done? Nobody knows how to give a real address to resolve the question: whether it is territorial or other it does not matter because a solution should be achieved.

Publication date: March 28, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly