Bingo: the call for tenders is anxiously expected
If it were (finally) in place the announcement for the bingo, as expected for some time by this segment and by the associations that protect companies, in the current regulatory situation, it could be damage to the entire sector. More and more times the Federbingo has pointed out to the institutions that if not survived before this announcement the national reorganization of the sector would be almost a calamity. And this is not to "give reasons" to the opinion of the Council of State that suggested "adequate insights" to the Customs and Monopolies Agency and also to the Ministry of Economy and Finance right on the Bingo call: this precise opinion of the CDS , of course, he moved the waters, making them agitated. Proceeding with the concession now right now, when the complete reform of the sector and its legislation is not yet feared on the horizon, it is equivalent to making the insecurity perceived by the market and would sound like a suggestion not to participate in the much coveted race.
Thus, the interests and investments probably would move elsewhere: the whole game wants security and this failure to reorganize does not emit certainties and does not protect any future investments of those who still "insist" in wanting to capital in this business. By now, all the protagonists of the game recognize that the current collection model is no longer compatible with the local standards that "arise as mushrooms" in an almost "schizophrenic" way and the perception of the current legislation on the game is that it is often used not To limit its collection, but to ban it. The opinion of the CDS is targeted so that the administration clarifies how the future announcement has the requirements to avoid the expulsive effect, which has now become a sort of "true bogey" for gambling companies.
In reality, the expulsive effect itself, achieved in some territories, is having a devastating result for the economy of those regions and for unemployment: it automatically follows the closure of many companies, even of many American legal casino American, who cannot "keep their business open" for the excessive taxation, or who cannot economically move to other areas to submit to the local legislation "of the distancines". The "drawers of the exercises dealing with the game" are certainly not "collections of collections": and hence the decisions that some entrepreneurs must take on to close and fire their employees. It would be better to follow the opinion of the CDS and deepen the text and content of this call for the bingo and see that the playful activities are truly protected and not "thrown up to the spoil as to the bullfight". It is thought that the world of public game has already suffered enough and already quite struggled for their rights which, according to the writer, in some territories have been truly trampled and forgotten.
So why start a new "initiative" like the call for the Bingo with the wrong foot? The thought of the CDS is clear: has recognized that the non -uniformity of the legislation on the game is certainly the national market and is a limitation to the collection, which has now become a constant variable the refusal the right that the game concessions should contain, precisely because State concessions and being the public game "one of his reserve". By now, it is more than evident that this no longer represents anything. On the other hand, it is also necessary to be goals: the yellow-green executive is certainly not in favor of the sector of public game (and therefore lawful) and imagining a reorganization that starts from this precise prerequisite is something that can certainly appear contrary to gaming companies. So what will happen in the meantime? It is evident that the more time passes, the more the national regulatory decisions Lighty, the more the sector will have an absolutely negative result.
The regional rules, and among these in particular those of Piedmont, Emilia Romagna and Puglia, are failing the legal network in favor of the irregular offer and, therefore, illegal that awaits nothing more than regaining the market. It should not be forgotten that the agreement born at a unified conference provided for a uniform reorganization throughout the territory, but in compliance with local regulations: this is a set -up, and with the experience of the last few months, which can only be put in place with initiatives " Equipped with fervent fantasy ". Last but not least, the "problem" of the tax revenue: anyone can think that a more concentrated and less capillary game network will lead to a reduction in the offer with the consequent decrease in tax resources. So, the search for covers is born and this will be a theme of difficult solution for the technicians of the MEF. If regional regulations are not "defused", the state budget will have to face a abyss in which a sea of companies will fall and consequently, we will be confronted with a rather relevant employment problem and, above all, of almost impossible solution, seen The times that run.
The still lactit work even if a certain quantity has been promised to those who will join the citizenship income, which is still nebulous in its realization and in the numbers of job offers: still today it is not understood where the executive will find that number of offers that has been guaranteed to every citizen who will request citizenship income. From all these reflections clearly emerges the concept that "without having a national legislation, the publication of a call is not possible": it seems to be the unique opinion of the associations that protect the companies of the Bingo game that continue to solicit this urgent provision at national levelAnd with this provision the policy must regulate a sector that today has a jagged legislation: each municipality acts "for itself and for its territory" and, perhaps, one hundred meters there is another (in common) that has different rules and other strategies to face the game. It is evident that the entrepreneur who participates in a national race would not know how to move: therefore, either the state regulates the game, or prohibits it completely. But what he cannot do is to issue a game of game without knowing the sector: it would be almost a scam towards entrepreneurs and we are sure that the government of change does not want it.
Publication date: April 30, 2019 at 12:00
casino | Review | Visit |
---|---|---|
888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500 |
Visit | |
Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $ |
Visit | |
LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$ |
Visit | |
Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$ |
Visit | |
Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
Starcare 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $ |
Visit | |
william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$ |
Visit | |
Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $ |
Visit | |
Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300 |
Visit | |
Want to win 100% up to $ 1000 |
Visit | |
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly |