Puglia: less restrictive innovations are boycott about the game

Despite the yellow-green executive, let it leak that perhaps a game and the gods will be reached Best casino (The appointment of the Undersecretary of Villarosa Games should be the prodrome) The Five Star Movement does not want to leave the pre-electoral track that conveyed a sort of "aberration" against the public game and "makes a barrier" on any change of regulations that are Less restrictive than those existing "since 2013" and that, today, they can be obsolete since the territorial situation of the playful activities on our peninsula has evolved, and not a little. Instead, the M5S wants to stand still at that year, to those rules, to those provisions: inviting the councilors of the Puglia Region not to vote less restrictive changes. Indeed, they are urged not to reduce the distances from the so -called sensitive places for gaming activities and to continue to carry on the topic of the distanziometer as required by the aforementioned law of the "distant 2013".

Distanziometer that some still consider a valid tool to counter the problematic game, even if it has been acclaimed that this does not correspond to the truth at all. Besides everything, and it really seems a paradox, it leverages the movement towards the Apulian councilors with a "moralistic discourse": How do the same councilors who in 2013 voted for the law in force today, to "change the flag" and want a more permissive one? As if the councilors "rescued the commitments made" and change their way of thinking ... it seems to find us in another time and with a "obsolete" way of thinking that does not want to adapt to the times and the technological evolution that pervades any sector : let alone that of the game that makes an essential part of one's being. But, evidently, the men and women of the Five Star Movement, who also declare that they are a deployment of the "change", therefore, and which make the use of "modernity" integral part of their political idea, remain anchored to decisions made In 2013 and they don't want to move from this address.

The less restrictive vision of the law approved in that year is absolutely not seen in good eye and it is believed that it is "too less restrictive" to get to the contrast of ludopathy and that it almost completely reset the points deemed "sensitive". These sensitive places, with the rule that you would like to vary, are "reduced" to high schools, universities and libraries, and would reduce the distanziometer from 500 meters to 250, in practice halving it: but this, without a doubt, is to be attributed to the The fact that otherwise there would be no hope for any playful activity of being able to open a commercial activity that is worthy of this name in a part considered commercial from an economic point of view. And this speech appears somewhat far from the mentality of the M5S councilors and for this reason they are beating themselves, opposing the variation that has been proposed to this notorious "Law on the game of 2013".

But the times change: we should not continually have to want to keep the public game in hostage of tools that should contrast the problematic game, but that do not have the ability to do anything for this discomfort that should instead be contrasted with information, the culture, knowledge and awareness. As it is tried again, they are not "useful" to spread the "Park of Sensitive Places" out of all proportion since otherwise you will cover the whole territory and absolutely never remains a "commercially useful" space for game activities: apparently that is the purpose of this deployment politician who, on the other hand, has not disconnected this intention. And not only that: we also complain, always to oppose the variation and innovation of the 2013 law, that the President of the Region has not expressed itself on "this shameful situation" (words of the five stars) except with some facade declaration who did not express anything positive.

Indeed, this appears to be the right situation to lash out against the activities of the President of the Puglia Region who is responsible for not dealing with the spread of gambling disorder due to the inconsistency of his work as a councilor for health: In fact, no concrete action has been implemented for the prevention of the problematic game, an aspect in which it appears that the Puglia regional institutions have been Latty for years. Not even the end that the regional observatory against the pathological gambling that should have worked with local institutions and trade associations for monitoring the territory has not known and nothing of the information and sensitization campaigns on risks is known linked to the gambling disorder for which funds had been allocated in the 2016 and 2017 budget. As can be seen from these statements, the 5 -star councilors are avid, and not a little, underlining that they hope they are not the only ones to fight against the lobbies of the gamble.

Absolutely opposed to this "saying and making the Five Star Movement" is Acadi, Association of public games affiliated to Confcommercio Imprese for USA, but first it is necessary to specify what is the "voice" of Acadi: it represents over 70% of the public and regulated game control system in USA which generates and paying over 7 of the approximately 10 billion $ per year of tax revenue. After this premise, here is a note issued precisely by this association that "has had the opportunity to represent that an expulsive distanziometer such as that of the law of the Puglia Region of 13 December 2013, is able to determine nefarious consequences in terms of the failure to protect the health of the citizens, of public order, of the tax revenues, and above all of the company and work ". It is evident that Acadi shares the need to reach less restrictive rules that safeguard the needs for the protection of freedom of business, employment levels, legality and health of the players: the 2013 regional law compromises the commercial path of many companies playful with unsuitable instruments with respect to the purposes that are declared of protecting the gambling disorder and disturbance from Sports betting online.

Publication date: June 18, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly