A great revolution in the American game is coming

Even before spreading these lines, it is assumed that the answer to this question will remain unwilling! Even if you are continuing to underline, recently, that "yet it moves" ... that is, that in the world of games and gods casino on line Something is changing and, above all, moving: and the intervention of the current yellow-green executive for the reform of the recreational sector, as promised in the dignity decree, in the part that concerned the games, but whose terms are also abundantly expired. So, probably, for this last "governmental" lack, the reform of the game offer that the previous legislature had reached in 2017 returns: an agreement resulting from the unified conference between the State, Regions and Local Authorities which, however, "not had been followed "by the relative implementation decree. And we ask ourselves where this agreement signed by the State and all the regions really never finished, even if the latter then disconnected their signature, unpleasantly bringing a reckied wave of restrictive ordinances that brought the sector of games in the current condition of discomfort.

Even today we ask ourselves for what reasons, then, no executive provision of this agreement was never adopted and because, as well, it was not currently done by the yellow-green executive. And, moreover, if the latter realized that the territorial autonomies that, as mentioned, had signed the agreement, they have in practice unknown and did not consider themselves to adapt to the contents that had been thus staticly reached and shared in Unified conference. This appears truly serious because those "agreements of agreement" had been long, difficult, battle: and with today's results that the public game is suffering would be the case to "resume the situation", mainly to avoid excessive game concentrations In some areas of the territory and conditions instead of absence of public service in others, but also to control the number of operators and the consequent market freedom.

These observations become even more "alive and vegetable" if you look at the assignment of the 15 thousand "betting rights" and the relative announcement that was examined by the Council of State that expressed itself in a very raw way against the Ministry of Economy and finances that had requested its opinion. In fact, the CDS had underlined that the attitude of local authorities with the introduction of the various "distanciars" and "ignition time slots" had not been taken into the debt account in drafting the same tenders for the tenders for Bettingnull A somewhat detailed opinion, severe, and substantially negative of the famous already recalled calls for bets, as the CDS noted that "it is not understood how the ten thousand shops and the four thousand game points foreseen in the race procedure can be able to land in the area".

It is not clear, in fact, how the network of these points can make a distribution criterion and in what way, above all, in order to avoid excessive concentrations in certain areas and how, finally, in the documents to be attached to the tender, Manchi Any albeit small indication that can guide the choices and distribution of these game points. In addition, then, the CDS underlined that the design of the territorial network is not part of the technical offer that is postponed to the phase following the "award" of the possible sales point ... which is even more absurd: obviously, it is believed to be Part of the Council of State that all this (calls for tenders) has not taken into consideration the current situation of the territory, but not even the most direct one of the same sector of the public game: and that's not all.

Also in the opinion of the CDS, we consider that no obligation to provide candidates to provide any list of the territorial sales network is not foreseen in this blessed tender for betting for bets: As evidenced, however, also doubts about the obligation of dealers to activate only 30% of the rights acquired. This would derive from the consideration that, probably, dealers would find difficulties in opening the game points, considering the regional laws in force on the matter throughout the national territory. It is evident to the CDS that the calls pose many and evident perplexities to be able to ensure adequate (and hoped for) revenues for the tax authorities.

And after what was expressed by the Council of State, the hiding of the implementation decree of the intended conference is even more pregnant, since this document would have placed very serious "stakes" on the distribution of the game in the area and would certainly have prevented the degenerate the "to make local authorities and the regions" that have clearly put themselves sideways for the development of play activities throughout the peninsula, from north to south. The implementing decree should have been issued: but the serious fact is that this has not yet happened and is truly inexplicable. The Council of State would support and suggest the need to proceed, even in the absence of the same ministerial transposition decree, to what is expressed in the guidelines for the reorganization of the legislation on the game and, in particular, to arrive at the definition of a national system of rules relating to the territorial distribution of the game points: and all in a fair and homogeneous way at national level.

You cannot know if the Undersecretary of the Games will take into consideration the "track" of this agreement when "it will take the boiling potato" of the reorganization of the recreational sector in her hand: it is hoped only that it does it considering that at that moment it seemed a well -studied track and shared. Local authorities and the regions, who in that agreement have seen their power increase, will certainly be sorry, since from that subscription onwards they have "sued" conspicuously with their laws on the game: it is hoped that a new edition of the agreement is not yet so favorable to the local institutions themselves, in contempt for the interests of the whole game industry. But we are sure, given the positive predisposition that Undersecretary Villarosa has manifested, that a fair, sustainable reorganization and in the interest of all will be in place: at least this is hope, with or without implementation decree of the intended exit from the conference Unified.

Publication date: May 27, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly