Government choices for the fate of gambling

Sooner or later we will be able to understand the motivation for which the central government, and in particular the Draghi government, does not want to openly take sides against the game and the Best online casino Through the expression of clear and definitive "field choice" that concerns the fate of the public game, representative of state products and authorized to this with state concessions that should be synonymous with safety and protection of legality. However, it could also be said that these two words have not been attempt for some time in the "vocabulary" of the world of games. In fact, surely it still has its safety sector and does not transmit it and as regards legality, it will be necessary to see if the legal game activities will be able to recover all that part of the market that has been occupied by the illegal game during the long absence emergency on the territory of the public game. And, unfortunately, it will not be a sliding and fast company also because the (practical) intervention of the state is still missing in the drafting of the national reorganization of the entire game sector.

The recovery of the gamble In all its sectors, unfortunately, largely depends on the lack of expression by the central government on the fate of the legal game and the playful industry, all compact, awaits this choice by politics. In other words, a sort of "verdict" on the fate of the public game is expected: if you decide to keep alive the "creature" created by the state about twenty years ago, but trying to consolidate and redevelop its presence, or if It will be decided to deny this work, accepting the concrete risk, already savored during the pandemic emergency, to relegate the gambling in the hindleality from which it "taken" many years ago and which has grown in the arms of the legality with the presence of legal game activities. It is a necessary choice of field that the government should make, and this time truly "without if and without but" because if the path of public game should continue, it must be protected by a linear, transparent and uniform regulation.

Certainly it cannot be continued with the current one, composed and supported by a myriad of rules and "rules" that do not leave the sector, nor the player, nor the tax funds: and this because if there is no national reorganization of the game and of sport bets, the latter will not be able to guarantee that collection to which the tax authorities were used to and the players will no longer have those certainties they have enjoyed so far in the legal game. It is all too evident that he reigns a heavy discontent among the operators of the game that do not realize why a sector that has always produced resources for the rather large state, where employment has never been a problem, such as the remuneration of its own workers, it must be so "under shooting" by politics and cannot find its place in the social. Placed among other things busy for many years and which has helped the state budgets to try to "get out of that perennial red" that accompanies it.

Today the game sector is completely abandoned by the central government that continues to promise and that never, however, maintains even if its different undersecretaries who have followed one who has been hung themselves to seek a solution. We must remember the work of Pier Paolo Baretta in a unified conference and also that of brakes which, albeit of a new appointment, has declared itself several times predisposed to the reorganization of the sector. Unfortunately, with the verbal will and with the many promises we do not come to anything concrete that it can represent a reassuring choice of field: indeed many speeches made they think that it will never be reached by the lens of the new regulation of the game and the poker online Because otherwise the "first works in progress" would be seen to get to the reorganization. Instead, we have already started on the wrong foot: with the onerous extension of the concessions, which has already been discussed in another article, which seems exactly the "litmus test" of the relationship between politics and public game.

Politics "Fa, just to do", but without consulting the real data of the recreational sector and referring to long-standing collections that are far from the current ones, especially post-plays. And if this is the first step towards the reorganization, it is certainly not possible to say that "it is at half of the work" ... but if the central government decides the reasons for the existence on the territory of the public game, its reform And the reorganization of the sector would be truly urgent and would have "now passed the time of words", we should definitely spend the facts before the sector implodes. And here is the "field choice" that was talked about at the beginning of these lines: the central government should "return to decide 'personally' of his' public game" considering that the same game was created precisely To offer state game products to those who seek them and who, with all due respect to the detractors, are not few and who "invoke" the right to have a legal game safe.

The reorganization should make some corrections first of all to the concession model and in particular to the rules contained in the concessions and tenders that continue to be extended: which the European Commission does not see well and with Europe it would be necessary to be decidedly Be careful, just when the various projects that Draghi has prepared and that are monitored with extreme attention are about to implement. So, false steps cannot be done and it would really be to not reorganize the entire games and the games sector app casino, when Europe knows very well that this world can be a source of remarkable resources to help the rebirth of our country's economy. The entire game supply chain should also be revisited to check and better define the different roles and responsibilities of each operator: all accompanied by the recognition of these figures perhaps with specific authorizations. Things that currently lack the organization of the supply chain itself and that sometimes caused "misunderstandings", to certainly use it mildly.

Publication date: 20 December 2021 at 18:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly