Politics should face the problematic game seriously
Even today, but this has really lasted for a long time, perhaps too much, we find ourselves "reflecting" on the game yes, I play no: if this represents the smiling face of healthy entertainment, or "something" that destroys people, families and , automatically, which puts in crisis territories and decentralized institutional structures. This different vision of the world of public game in negative meaning should seriously recall the attention of the government to deal with this issue: Inevitably, one should turn to the problematic game that descends from the abuse of gambling, including the abuse of Play the online casino, and from the little awareness of what can derive when approaching, with too much lightness, to this healthy fun not knowing the risks deeply. Today, by virtue of the explosion of the phenomenon of the game, the institutions are also informing the playing audience on these drifts, but by-passing the information, it has come to apply prohibitions of various nature, putting the whole game sector in deep crisis.
At such a point that many game companies are forced to close: for this reason the institutions should finally face this phenomenon in a serious way. Understanding, or making it clear but without influencing to the bitter end, whether or not the game is an entertainment to be approached and how to do it safely, it is the task of the central institution that governs our country. Instead, the executive guides its legislative interventions from the aversion that particularly a part of the current political deployment nourishes towards the world of public game, reaching the field of a total ban on advertising to games and bets. Not to mention that the current government, but also the previous ones, have allowed and are allowing decentralized institutions to issue restrictive ordinances "to the bitter end", and are allowing distanziometers from sensitive places and well -defined hourly bands, without intervening: but, above all, Without "even putting a national law on the game on site" which would perhaps put the term to the agony of the playful sector.
Law, however, announced several times but of which no trace is seen. And thank goodness that to deal with the issue of gamble, e delle sue derive, ci pensano le associazioni di categoria che trovano sempre tempo per organizzare convegni, per avere dialoghi, per scambiare esperienze sul gioco problematico: l’ultimo convegno, denominato “Non t’azzardare, eh”, si è tenuto a Firenze dove è intervenuta l’Anci Toscana ed il Sindaco di Prato. L’Anci, in modo particolare, continua a sottolineare quanto sia importante il proprio impegno per cercare di contrastare il gioco problematico con soluzioni, regole condivise e campagne informative: ma tutto questo “fare” va a scontrarsi con la “pratica” che si permette di mettere in atto sull’italico territorio. Infatti, se in autogrill si dà come resto un gratta& vinci, oppure se la nazionale di calcio viene sponsorizzata da una società di scommesse, si va “a sbattere contro un muro invalicabile” e si rischia, anche, una sorta di “corto circuito” nazionale. Il gioco problematico è, senza dubbio, un fenomeno subdolo che si avvicina, inevitabilmente, ad una “qualsiasi dipendenza”.
And in the face of a problem of similar importance, politics has the duty to intervene, the central government that must protect its citizens and must educate them and to instruct them, but which must not resort to prohibition, certainly not worthy of a democracy. Instead, the various interests and the various factors that the game and the sport bets They put on the pitch: and there are positive things in the game. First of all, a "sea of resources occupied permanently" at the game industry, both direct and induced, occupation that unfortunately our current executive cannot guarantee at least for the moment: given, however, that for the citizenship income The idea of proposing an immeasurable number of jobs has undergone ... you will see! Just the job offers are not in the game, of course. It should not be forgotten, also, that the organized crime that "takes force and breath" from the logistical difficulties that the world of lawful game is forced to suffer from the restrictive ordinances is also insinuating in gambling.
Yes, the world of games seems to be the "favorite" from crime: let alone today that there are "around so many legitimate players" who no longer have the opportunity to entertain themselves with the legal game and, therefore, have "become available" for what it is not! And this, sorry to say, is due to the hiding of the national law on the game that would put an end to the various regulations that "obstruct" the commercial journey of the public game. It is all too evident that the "entrepreneurial aims" of mafia organizations in the field of game and bets cause huge relapses not only for the failure to make up for the tax authorities, which come from the same illegal game taken from its coffers, but also on the level of the Security of the territories and the same players: therefore, by undermining the entire economic system of our country. And not even before this, the yellow-green executive intervenes with a national law that would save "goat and cabbage", but as already mentioned, it is not yet talked about, at least for the moment.
For crime, the recreational sector is interesting for its potential, for the great cash movement that the same entails and, consequently, for the opportunity that the same sector offers to recycle, invest, "wash and iron" without serious risks The illegal money, the result of the mafia and criminal activities that produce large capital from other "traditional" illegal sectors, such as drugs and wear to name just a couple. If politics, the one with a capital "P" will not be hurry to intervene, will also have to deal with the perception that public opinion is having illegal game: a criminal activity that is built simply as an "alternative service" to that Legal offered by the state, given that the public game can be traced with difficulty, fatigue, determined times ... while the illegal game "is becoming more comfortable". And to this "transformation" of the market, the executive should look carefully and study an intelligent and functional intervention to regulate the game sector, but should never get to forbid it, for this reason it is believed to have already done enough.
Publication date: 11 March 2019 at 12:00
casino | Review | Visit |
---|---|---|
888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500 |
Visit | |
Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $ |
Visit | |
LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$ |
Visit | |
Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$ |
Visit | |
Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
Starcare 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $ |
Visit | |
william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$ |
Visit | |
Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $ |
Visit | |
Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300 |
Visit | |
Want to win 100% up to $ 1000 |
Visit | |
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly |