The double face of the government towards gambling

The old diatribe who has held the bench for a long time, and who feels involved in the first person because we love the world of games and the casino online ADMUnfortunately, the central government that has created and is the master of the public game, represented by its "state reserves" which, however, never as in the last three years have undergone from the institutions (regional and local), a obstructionism is revealed over the years pushed to the nth degree, it opposes him under the tray. It happens on the one hand with the ordinances and rules that are allowed to the regions without "nothing butteri" and that impose the much infamous distances of different measure to the game activities: while on the other, when the opportunity is presented or the gain , here is that public opinion is invited to participate, to give an example, to the "Lottery of the receipts" or to the cash back that are so involving consumers. Both possibilities of "easy gain" that push and make citizens "run" behind a draw and a prize that is hoped for accessible.

We do not go away from the attitude that from a certain point in the history of the public game continues to be clear: the pull and spring of the central government (always underground that seems to be the chosen attitude) on the play of gambling e Mobile mess with applications. Game that is comfortable on the one hand, but on the other it "makes you lose votes" and, therefore inevitably, you have to do so to contrast and fight. Sometimes, however, without discovering the cards too much, or even making themselves fugitive in the decisions that would be in charge of the same central government. The latter, in fact, should hold "the command of state reserves" being representatives of the legality of the game product by means of the now increasingly appointed state concessions. But these concessions probably, and even in the short deadline, could even be "useless" if in some territories, one for all in Piedmont, it continued in the application of the regional law: many small and medium -sized enterprises would be outlawed.

In short, the world of game is increasingly confused by this attitude of the new Draghi government that does not decide to give birth to the notorious national reorganization of the entire playful sector. Tool and attitude that would openly demonstrate that the government "keeps to its public game", it wants to openly exploit the resources that today more than ever would be very useful for the rebirth of the country's economy. As has already been affirmed several times, the lack of the usual tax jackets that come from the playful sector, as happened last year due to the closure of all the game activities with the consequent failure to collect, have truly missed the state budget. Certainly, however, the sides of the government alongside the game could be negative. Which, however, was done in the most recent policy by a specific political movement that expressed itself in its maximum intentions with the ban on advertising to the games and to Betting, inserted in the dignity decree, giving a terrible jolt to the sector that quickly had to change its economic organization.

At that moment the advent of the Dignity Decree, little understood even by foreign investors who were "surprised and unbalanced", forced several companies to review contracts and partnerships that led to the game companies themselves a considerable nest era every year. But so it happened and so that movement perhaps acquired some other popular vote that has not solved, however, its political life given the chaos that is currently experiencing with discussions that do not foresee anything good between the former Premier Conte and Beppe Cricket. Why are these dissertations that are now old today? Simply because in these days the same obsolete question returns, but which has never been resolved: which side the central government really is in proportion to the world of gambling And to its consumers? The controversies of these days are not plagued on the receipt lottery and on the cashback which are considered "ambiguous", as they do not go to contrast the submerged economy.

There is then discussed in politics of the different use that "these state games" should be made in relation to the PNRR, the national recovery and resilience plan, which would have every right to be respected and fed also with the resources of these games instead of being "returned" to consumers. A part of politics, as brothers of USA, is struggling for this principle, but also to be able to declare the exact position that intends to take the central government towards the games sector, Bonus Casino included. There is more and more confusion between institutional relations with the playful world and it was possible to see it from the attitude of the new executive towards the game activities during the pandemic: legal game closed for more than eight months and this certainly does not determine " Protection of state reserves ", but it means having given an almost fatal blow to the sector, above all without having really undertaken tangible supports for these companies with" non -essential "activities that have undergone such a long Lockdown.

And on that occasion it was understood which way the institutions are: certainly not on the side of the public game, otherwise something could have been done more concrete. Instead, the game that acts on behalf of the state was left alone and in disarray to survive during all that very long closure with the only personal resources of the operators: many have made it, but unfortunately as many are not and so, in addition to closing the own small or medium enterprises have also had to fire their employees. So, we return to the ambiguous behavior of the institutions: the lottery receipts and cashbacks: why not use these resources to support the playful sector, that of catering and hotels certainly penalized more than others during the pandemic? Or why not use such resources to build new prisons? Instead, consumers have "pushed" to spend more, to participate in competitions and therefore to play dirty without thinking of using the relative resources for a social that would really need it.

Publication date: July 18, 2021 at 18:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly