To improve gambling, a responsible government is needed

Today more than ever that the chapter of the national reorganization of the entire game and gods could really open up New Casino, it would be necessary to understand the motivation that pushed some executives, starting from those "four hands" to arrive (alas) also to that of Mario Draghi, to exempt themselves from the responsibility of intervening in the regulation of the public game, allowing the regions to issue "laws And read "who in the end turned back to the administrations that created and put them on the field. Regional laws that, unfortunately, have led the playful sector to the current situation, disastrous economically and tragic territorially where there are gaming activities even expelled from their territorial realities. Therefore, already understanding this "bizarre" motivation would be a remarkable step forward, even if it certainly would not solve the fate of many companies, but the answer could perhaps give a move for the field of a new game regulation.

Certainly, today, the protection of legality cannot be considered only a task of the state, but must also be accompanied by the sector that represents it and which must undoubtedly "do more". But this does not exempt the same state from its responsibilities, above all of having "shot its heads on the other side" in the past four years when the games sector declared openly, and on several occasions included in those of the square, that there were critical issues from attribute to the notorious regional laws on the game. Rules that had to be changed, indeed that they should not have existed if the state "had opened their eyes before" making itself an account of the situation of "his" world of games: This is to be considered the right time to stem a situation that has been dragging for some time and that the government, unfortunately, has allowed. It would be necessary to implement with more speed the development plan that is being discussed, activating it exclusively for the network dealers the electronic management of the game through its appliances.

Thus the same dealers, proportionally to their collection, could contribute to studies and research in the context of an annual plan managed by the Customs and Monopolies Agency aimed at the development of the Responsible and safe gamenull This would offer a specific study for each sector for the protection of health and the security of the players and would allow to broaden the knowledge of data and information. Also in this way you could collect data for a qualitative improvement of the legislation that will be carried out shortly, and as confirmed once again by the Undersecretary Brakes. You could perhaps go "to close those decision -making voids" that the government has implemented and that led to that sort of "decision -making abdication" as part of the game in favor of regional administrations, as if the same public game was no longer relevance of the central government, but of local competence. Which is no longer "welcome" to the entire game industry that would like to have its only and real point of reference in the same central government.

It may also be, even if honestly it seems truly absurd, that this "abdication" of the central government in the decisions relating to the game is depended on the too delay that over the years has accumulated in the decisions to be undertaken: why the same central government has thought of delegating everything to the regions. And it should not be forgotten that this problem had already emerged in 2017 in the unified conference where the "decision -making problem" had already been posed then: in that same conference the famous agreement had come out, never followed by the relative implementation decree, which has it Made a "useless" agreement since it devoid of its legislative force. Although, more and more frequently, even by the Tar judges who have come to attribute to him "his validity", precisely to be helped to dilute the roughness that gradually came to light, is brought up. Perhaps it would be appropriate to take, as "the bull for the horns" is said and put themselves at work for the national reorganization of the game and the sport bets, the right time would seem to "reconstitute the right roles"!

Also to balance the interests of the central government and the local ones, the reorganization and homogeneity of the legislation that must be browsed by all that overlap of rules that inevitably eliminate and which complicate the life of the game activities rather than regulate it is definitely served. And which obliges operators to turn to the various TARs too often to see, or not, their "right to exist": a sometimes dangerous path, evidently very expensive both in the money and in the time that makes itself available. And, in any case, everything above always emerges the delay with which the legislator could have taken action in the face of an avalanche of rules and ordinances that ended up destabilizing both the companies and the game market and the app casino, already penalized by the Dignity Decree with the prohibition of advertising to the games that infected "mercilessly" on the economic situation of the entire world of games.

And here too, the responsibility of the central government is undoubtedly. That measure obtained and issued with a supersonic speed from a certain political deployment was looking forward to blocking the expansion of the use of the game and the poker In the area and that he has not kept first of all present that the American player exists, follows and research the game and if he does not find it on the legal part, he also confronts what is not that, on the other hand, it is always reachable. From this it could also be deduced that the prohibition of advertising (place that prohibiting one thing is how to encourage its use and ancient experience should have taught something) has to help illegal game to progress in its path towards the appropriates of a part of territory, regreting its speakers that certainly do not need to be supported by the state. Because so it happened and of this the central government should consciously admit its responsibility, considering that more than an expert on the subject has widely confirmed the succession of this path.

Publication date: December 18, 2021 at 18:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly