Legal gambling asks for the intervention of politics
Today, and here from these lines, we would like to start with the "result" of a research carried out by Nomisma entitled "The priority of intervention requested from politics" and from which it appears that gambling, and also i Best American Casino, is completely absent from the list of priorities for which the Italic population requires the intervention of politics. But why do you want to emphasize this "consideration"? Simply because for a long time an "ideological-political fury" has been put in place against the game that is not doing at all well in the same sector and to its businesses, above all since all this battagliare is not required by citizenship as the game does not come Received as the main need to be solved: there are other more important ones. Fighting the game is ridden by politics as if it were "a divine mandate" and a problem to be solved because this is what requires public opinion. But that's not the case.
That of attacking the game, and therefore his companies, was a choice by a given political deployment: unfortunately, "with this doing" to the current situation with a little strong media attacks that were prodrome of regulatory interventions objectively "reliable and frustrating". Rules that are bringing considerable damage to the playful activities that are pointed out as "crime bearers" on the American territory and that make it perceive The presence of the game As completely negative both for the health of citizens and for the territory. This was the result that all the campaigns against the "immoral game" have achieved, without considering the recent electoral one that has certainly not "paid" these choices: but, of course, it is not correct to go into a political analysis that can make judgments express on recent electoral results.
While "we like" to emphasize that the regulation of the public game has not been absolutely addressed in a pragmatic way, with the real purpose of preventing the negative effects that today the implementing rules are causing, but has been addressed only in "instrumental optics". This is intended to reiterate it. As we "like" also to find that the maneuvering space of politics, in being able to affect the "real reality" of our country, is always being reduced, and the constraints that limit its action induce the same policy to seek consents in those Sectors of public life where a maneuvering space still resists. And in gambling the road is still passable although directed in a single sense: unfortunately, contrary to what could make the playful sector socially sustainable. This policy of the yellow-green executive does not want a game present in the life of the American citizens, it only wants a public game present when the latter can "draw and use their resources full of them.
Resources that, in brackets, the game has not "never refused" to pay. In short, on the one hand, the current policy returns the world of games at the national emergency level, while on the other it refuses to analyze with intellectual honesty the problems that can descend and that would not be unsolvable. Now, we only miss that a part of the current executive passes the negative results obtained in the last elections as a "pledge" that the same line "has to pay" for having been so present in the criminalization of the legal game and having ridden this topic " To defend the territory and its citizens from immoral game and from Betting on football"By supporting this path in its programs. Thus, the failure of the M5S should be interpreted a consequence of its deployment against the world of games. To this ideological fury, however, there is no end: the same political part has even gone to attribute, and very proudly, the increase in taxation on the game as a "punitive value" towards the sector and not, as instead It is clearly, a greater collection of resources to support pre-electoral initiatives that could not, without those resources, be brought to success!
But we intend to deepen the relationships between politics and play and, above all, the results that certain politics will lead to the economy of our country: all unrelated to purely propaganda slogans that, unfortunately, the game is forced to undergo. And we do not want to question the political beliefs of each deployment, or the faculty of those who manage our country to choose the priorities of the political action they intend to implement. In fact, the strategy of those who believed that the address of the game was an emergency required by public opinion was, without a shadow of a doubt, wrong from the beginning because precisely from the beginning it was chosen to lash out against the Game industry not even taking into consideration the idea of reviewing and resolving the emergencies that were somewhat clear in that sector. But above all to have allowed, with their hiding and with the lack of wanting to face the phenomenon of public game, and therefore legitimate, that absolutely restrictive regulatory regulations were put in the field that sometimes even harm the freedom of business and, above all, The individual freedom of each one to decide how to spend their free time even if it was with gambling.
It was and is the task of the yellow-green executive to find solutions to the problems that most descend from an incorrect way of relating to the game: the responsibility, awareness and culture of the game are the tools that a state that has its citizens at heart It should be obliged to put in place, with all possible caution. None of this has been done, at least so far: and the result today is that the recreational sector is disintegrated by the rest of the social, it is to historical lows as revenues, many companies have been forced to close and many will close, many employees of the supply chain They are "a walk" and the resources that the praise of the tidy expected from the game are clearly at risk. The public game, which was up to a short time ago considered a load -bearing column of the economy of our country almost no longer exists, since it was expelled from many territories where the illegal game has been established, supplanted it: the one yes managed by organized crimeAnd the state of this could not be aware.
Publication date: June 21, 2019 at 12:00
casino | Review | Visit |
---|---|---|
888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500 |
Visit | |
Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $ |
Visit | |
LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$ |
Visit | |
Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$ |
Visit | |
Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
Starcare 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $ |
Visit | |
william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$ |
Visit | |
Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $ |
Visit | |
Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300 |
Visit | |
Want to win 100% up to $ 1000 |
Visit | |
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly |