Game: how to balance social and tax interests

Not a day passes, for some time now, that we don't talk about the world of gambling: tables, congresses, meetings, events. And we do not speak, also and above all, of all those inconsistencies that arose after the issue of the dignity decree, the ban on the advertising that the same contains and that politics has put in place: therefore, on the one hand "prohibition" e on the other increase in the taxation of the entertainment equipment sector. There is nothing to say a nice transparent attitude that there is no shadow of doubt contributes to clearing the mind of the game industry from indispensable questions: how the government will do, after this notorious decree to pretend that the world of games "produces "Still something that can be taxed to make him swallow from the eratory coffers?

How to balance, if someone in politics has ever thought about it, social interests (those of employment for example that does not seem to be the subject to be neglected in the most absolute way) with those of the tax revenues of which even this notorious government of change seems to be able to do Unless, despite everything that is putting on the field to obstruct the path of the playful industry? It is a demanding question and if up to now it has not been possible (by politics) to give an answer, it is feared that at the moment there is no reachable solution except what had already been prepared by the previous legislature with the signing of the Intesa between state, regions and local authorities that seemed precisely a "first stone" to get to this balance.

Therefore, the new government has put a series of somewhat stringent stakes for the game with money in money and, particularly, as regards the entertainment equipment and i Casino Online, but has also always entered the same dignity decree an increase in the unique taxation on these appliances. And at this point what can ever be the consequences of the total of the American game? Game that the previous government had already tried to regulate in its advertising with the bands considered "protected" but, objectionately, not with the results that had been charged. Perhaps, the old legislature had considered the transition to the total ban on advertising negative, believing that banning it completely would risk "pushing" players from the legal to the illegal sector: this is the worst fear and what could cause more damage to players problematic and those who are not aware of the risk that they run approaching the game without having perfect knowledge.

And then, the discussion always returns to the initial question about how to balance the social with the tax interest: certainly, for all those who have an interest in the health of citizens this is and must be primary and certainly must come before the economic interests. But it is also certain that the rules that have been implemented will not be effective to decrease the request for gambling and this is precisely the same government that reflects it when it goes to insert the income that will surely to come from the revenues attributable to the withdrawal on games: clearly, the legislator admits the irrelevance of what has approved and issued. We also think back to the path started by the former Undersecretary Pier Paolo Baretta with local authorities to overcome too many regulatory discrepancies on the sector to arrive at a framework law on the game at national level.

Many efforts have been made and many hours were committed to get to something relevant: a great patience work that then ended with the agreement (!) Reached (and not respected by some regions) in a unified conference that would have He had to be the basis to instill certainty to operators and safety and tranquility for the players: but so, unfortunately, it was not. The disaster that the behavior of some territories have concretized was devastating: Piedmont and Emilia Romagna were witnesses of how many appeals were presented to the various TAR against the game laws which, in practice, have expelled almost all of the activities that housed the Entertainment equipment. And they were also witnesses of the fear of many families who have seen each other fall into the abyss of an unknown future and without any minimal certainty.

So we ask: balance of social interests with tax revenues? And to those families who, due to "reckless" regulations, do not know if they will be able to "remedy lunch with dinner" someone (high spheres) has ever thought about it? And to think that these regulations and play laws have been issued to safeguard citizens' health! Certainly, not of those who operate in the game industry, of his companies and in everything that, as induced, revolves around the world of games: none of the government of change has thought to those who have not even the old legislature if we really want to be clear. Since the same allowed the regions to "swept" as they wanted, above all, of the new and increased powers that the unified conference itself had "given" to be able to close the agreement and the agreement.

At this point, it seems somewhat evident that it should have been (and could) think of a national framework law: and it is not said that this does not happen in the next half of the semester as anticipated by the dignity decree, even if some perplexities are allowed to externalize it. It would be the only way and the only tool to put the sector "in peace", the remaining operators (few) in a position to be able to work, albeit with important limits, and the players able to be in with a public offer of Leading game that guarantees and protect their personal and economic safety. But too difficult perhaps for a new government that "aborras" the world of games with what it contains, produces and consolidates: except, of course, instead, appreciate the resources that the same annually enters, always and in any case, in the praise coffers.

Publication date: 17 October 2018 at 12:10

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly