Explosion of online gambling among American players

Really many times, and in relative many occasions, it has been underlined how much the players' choices have changed during the various lockdown and also post-coronavirus in a particular way as regards the gambling and i casino online topnull In fact, during the health emergency, almost "obliged" were chosen by the home restrictions that alternating their lives in prison in their home but subsequently, to the restart of the activities including those of the game, the choice of players remained the same , always on online game, you want for convenience and want because in the remote game the sites that can be clicked, certainly not all legal, even if this is really really very much to have to say it. On the other hand, however, many times it was underlined that the increase and extension of the illegal game, linked to the pandemic emergency, cannot be considered the only excuse for this presence certainly "uncomfortable and competitive" towards of public game, therefore legal and state.

It is necessary, and not a little, to speak again of this situation of the trimming of illegality both as regards the terrestrial and for the online game, since the feeling is perceived that perhaps the dangerousness of the illegal game is not sufficiently clear for the players. This is particularly serious to the point that from a market research it emerges that a third of the gambling visitors ends up in the ranks of the illegal game, perhaps not distinguishing the difference between legality and illegality for what the sites of casino games, in particular for those who deal with online betting. A market research institute, "commissioned" by the game operators on the online channel, carried out a survey on a sample of two thousand people representing subjects of about 700 American municipalities. Poll that attests to the extreme difficulties that players encounter in the distinction between those who work in legality and those who do not do it and which, therefore, act outside of each rule.

Unfortunately, the sites are absolutely similar and without distinctions and this leads to the "confusion" between legal and illegal. And here we would not like to "put the finger in the plague", but this lack of distinction could certainly be attributed to the ban on the advertising introduced with the Dignity decree. On the result of this totalitarian rule there are several perplexity and uncertainties, just as it can be attributed to having aroused not ending discussions: the total prohibition of advertising has without doubt open the way, indeed a highway, to the illegal game that So he has the opportunity to range anywhere. Also the same survey was able to recover a disturbing data on the players who know the existence of illegal game sites and of Online betting: only 11.7% is aware of this and this data could be really worrying since these same "unsuspecting players" could fall into the illegal game network "almost without realizing it". It can therefore be said that in many cases the awareness of the danger of the online game and its interpreters is lacking: too few know the risks too much.

It would be to be added that the people of the players are substantially divided between those who believe that the ban on advertising has made the user less informed and, consequently, less protected and also that he has also contributed to "supporting illegal game". Another part, however, declares itself in favor of the ban. And this brings us back to a topic that has dragged on for a while: sectoral self -discipline to regulate advertising. Many companies already do it even if they have met a drop in collections, but driven by the principle of always operating in legality and in safety, without particular "special thrusts" or by "bonuses that cannot be refused" or other aggressive advertising forms that went to hit mainly the younger and influenceable audience. But not all the game companies have activated this path and so we find ourselves point to head, with a prohibition regulation such as the one put in place with the Dignity decree that perhaps could be questioned, precisely in this post-painted period.

This provision should certainly be at least revised: not to return to "so much advertising" but also try to be goals and evaluate that this ban has not been of much help to counter the problematic game: now there are many searches that have had a result similar. The result, therefore, is decidedly negative both for the social and for gaming companies and poker online who with this prohibition have lost huge capital that they still try to recover since the "blow" at the time of the dignity decree, therefore in 2016, was really strong and sometimes questioned the entire organization of many businesses, theirs Marketing, their Ship partners, and also know something about the sports companies that had a combination for years with the world of game and who have undergone a remarkable economic reinforcement over a part of penalties for not having respected the contracts, albeit the dignity decree He had allowed an appropriate timing to bring them to the end: but obviously it was not possible for everyone.

In short, making a remarkable slalom among the ravines of the online game so privileged at this moment, it seems that the two points on which it would be necessary to concentrate the efforts are the legality that should be more "supported" to prevent users from perhaps the less experienced ones, they do not fall in the illegal game network. And without a shadow of a doubt the advertising of the game and of the app casino which should be revisited in a more open way and with the experience of the pandemic period that should be kept very well present. Determine the time of the games and the maximum amount to be risked are two other strategies that could also be useful because in certain game devices it already exists. But also making the ban for further online concessions that would give voice to state activities and remove "space" from illegal sites: on the other hand the online is "without limits and borders" and, therefore, to deal with legality and not leave it in Hand to illegality would be a great maneuver: perhaps impossible to make, but hope for nothing and leaves the heart open ... of the many legal operators.

Publication date: December 16, 2021 at 18:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly