/

Who protects the investments of the game industry?

After hearing about the game and of Online casino platforms In "all sauces" possible and imaginable with ordinances, prohibitions, taxation increases and whoever has more put more, perhaps, the time has come to ask themselves if someone has ever worried about protecting investments (which are certainly not small) of the game industry and its operators who have been the public game for years in the area by means of their concessions. For this reason, it is reflected on the aftermath that still follow the decree, relating to the income of citizenship and to 100, that "brings up" the game: the opinions of the first structure that you want to "feel" are those of the USA game system, the Federation of the game of the game and entertainment industry, which adheres to Confindustria, externalized in the new series of auditions to the Chamber of Deputies. First of all, he must make the fact that the game sector is the most taxed in Europe. It arrives at peaks of 61-71% compared to the taxation on the margin which is applied to USA and which reaches 22%.

And it should not be forgotten that in less than a year, from the issue of the Dignity Decree there have been four increases in the preu on entertainment equipment, both AWP and VLT and also on bets. Strong criticisms have risen in the face of these increases, since this taxation and the increases in the rates are too "heavy" in relation to a game demand that is reducing in a significant way, also keeping in mind that for the situation of the current market Of the game, the unions felt forced to ask for a crisis table at the Mise. But as usual, what concerns the game It is not kept in the slightest consideration by the current yellow-green executive that when he does not know "what and who to tax" is still aimed at the game to be able to complete projects proposed before the elections and promised to citizenship. Obviously, who will pay for this is not importance: the important thing is to keep the pre-electoral promises.

Having the opportunity to express yourself in this hearing means having the opportunity to underline, once again, what is one of the main problems that has reduced the game to its knees: the proliferation of the restrictive ordinances that are concretizing the expulsion in some territories of the game state audience. Today, there are 19 regions and 150 municipalities of full -bodied dimensions, which have issued this type of game laws that forced a considerable number of gambling companies to close their doors, or to move to non -commercially interesting places, or even ad get out of this sector. This entails for the operators "renunciation of their investments" and thinking of "throwing up" in some other more profitable and less "difficult to manage on a psychological level": thus forgetting that you want to be a "reserve of state", since Today it no longer has any meaning since these "reservations" are more targeted by the executive.

If, then, the central government allows local authorities to regulate the world of games according to the "proper opinion" and almost "ad personam" and to issue restrictive ordinances of all kinds, a leopard stain regulation that contrasts absolutely with the Principle of uniqueness of the law that should guarantee unitary legislation: that's why the game industry wants a national law on the game which, finally, is equanimous and homogeneous and that puts all operators at the same level. It should not be forgotten that the current legislation was absolutely ineffective for the fight against the problematic game (objective that these rules had in their "viewfinder") as certified by the Higher Institute of Health: and if the central government does not even listen to this opinion and this Research cannot be understood to what you can "inspire" to find a solution to the problem of regulation of the entire playful sector.

Another element that SGI strongly underlines in this hearing, and which is also an element of critical issues, is the ban on advertising to the games and bets contained in the notorious Dignity Decree of last year which has affected as a "lightning bolt Sereno "the whole world of games that is still thinking how to face it so that they can allow many companies, particularly those operating online, to continue living commercially on the American territory. In support of these assertions, it should be remembered that in the "distant 2014" there has been a recommendation from the European Commission, in the guidelines for the protection of consumers, which clearly highly treaded the regulation of the advertising of the game and certainly not the its absolute ban. Evidently, our executive "to cut the head to the bull" has prohibited it in a total way ... and it cannot be denying that the advertising is the only system for the player to be able to distinguish the legal game from what instead does not is.

At the end of his speech, then, SGI refers to the increases of the preu with the provisions contained in the decree, underlining that these measures are truly oppressive for the world of games, weaken the public game supply chain and absolutely do not take into account the New distribution of the product following the 2016 Budget Law and, above all, of the aforementioned expelled laws that are placed throughout the territory, from north to south. It is clear that a reform of the sector that will have to be harmonious and sustainable has become absolutely indispensable for the players, the territory and the game industry which, despite everything, still represents the legitimate game and, consequently, legality. A fair taxation is needed that can allow companies to increase the safety of their devices, and above all it is necessary to solve the long -standing "territorial question" to continue to live commercially on a peaceful territory that can be based on the loyal collaboration between the world of game e Local institutions: without all this we cannot continue in any way and there is no doubt about this.

Publication date: March 16, 2019 at 12:00

casino Review Visit
888 casino
20 $ free + up to $ 500
Visit
Snai Casino
10 $ Free + 1000 $
Visit
Betway Casino
5 $ Free + 300 $
Visit
LeoVegas Casino
250 Giri + 1000$
Visit
Digital game casino
370 Giri + 500$
Visit
Eurobet Casino
30 Giri + 1005$
Visit
Bwin Casino
50 Giri + 200$
Visit
Starcare
50 Giri + 200$
Visit
BIG Casino
55 $ FREE + 300 $
Visit
william hill casino
200 Giri + 1000$
Visit
NetBet Casino
10 $ Free + 1000 $
Visit
Pokerstars Casino
500 Giri + 2500$
Visit
Betflag Casino
1000 $ free + 1000 $
Visit
Casino.com
10 $ FREE + 500 $
Visit
Unibet casino
100% up to $ 300
Visit
Want to win
100% up to $ 1000
Visit

The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction

Play responsibly