Still problems for slot machines and videolottery

Despite its crisis, which is becoming "infinite", the games sector, including the Best online casino, is one of the first in USA: it produces a turnover doubled in recent years and an incoming tax revenue now on the threshold of 10 billion $. This, according to a few well -informed, justifies that this world is particularly "attention" by the legislator and, consequently, becomes one of the possible areas of regulatory intervention: interventions that have a further and new increase in tax levy as an objective. Needless to say, when the state needs "fresh" resources he can't wait to turn to the world of games with some other "crazy taxation" to which the game industry must comply, even if in recent months the "thing "It is becoming really difficult to support. But an increase in the preu rates for the latest generation games that last year determined half of the overall state revenues from, precisely, from the public game, has already been announced.

We are talking about the new slot And of the VLTs: appliances on which, once again, we are aiming to multiply the tax revenues deriving from the lawful game chain and equipment (the new slots) that are activated via metal currency or with special electronic payment tools and that allow you to play games for a cost not exceeding 1 euro and with a maximum prize pool of 100 $. On the other hand, the VLTs are those appliances that distribute money in money with the possibility of winnings greater than the bar slots, so much so that they can perhaps be equated to the machines hosted in the casino. Both types of gaming appliances involve three different subjects: the dealer, the manager and the operator. The first boasts the ownership of the clearance for the installation, the second that enters into a dealer a contract for the various stages of the game operations and, finally, the third that holds the property of the place where the game appliance It is installed connected to the concessionaire electronic network.

These are the three protagonists of the supply chain that are forced to face a series of difficult tax problems. Problems that refer to the softening of the slots and the taxation of the proceeds that often and willingly lead to disputes with the Financial Administration. Between the two problems, without doubt the amortization of the appliances is what raises the greatest concern, precisely in relation to the procedure to be carried out to distribute the relative cost between the useful living exercises of the same machinery and to determine the business income of the individual exercises: undertaking not easy to implement. What complicates the amortization of the slots is the impossibility of attributing a specific category due to the "hybrid" nature of the appliances: in fact, the same are divided between simple machines and more sophisticated software. In the absence of very precise regulatory indications, it is not clear whether the AWPs must be framed among the material goods, and then to be able to understand among this category, or between intangible assets.

But it would also be simple if it was all here: wanting to bring back the Videopottery Among the tangible goods, there is no certainty of a specific amortization coefficient to be applied in the management of the game appliances due to the failure to update the guidelines contained in the ministerial tables relating to the various types. It seems evident that in the face of this scenario, the managers of the games of the playing attempt to insert the slots in material goods have sought varied strategies "following abstractions and connections" with other groups of goods that could be assimilated. Instead, as regards the shares of amortization, some have chosen to use 20% in analogy with electromechanical and electronic office machines, such as PCs and electronic telephone systems. Other managers have chosen, on the contrary, to assimilate the slots not already to a material good, but to an immaterial good by pointing out that in fact the game card is a software that interacts with the dealer system and allows you to reproduce play from the relative Videoterminale: for this reason they deduced the amortization share within the limit of 50% of the relative cost.

Obviously, the disputes by the Revenue Agency were not lacking. But why this time it wanted to enter such a specific topic? Only and simply since When it comes to the game It all appears complicated and dubious interpretation: So, the commercial journey of those who still venture into the "public game business" is not all fluid and without thoughts as you want to make it appear. On the contrary: everything is complicated, difficult to manage, you need to know laws and counter-leggings. Today more than ever when it has become very difficult to have a playful activity that can remain open to the public consider the existing rules and that "a reserve of state" must absolutely respect. Therefore, it does not correspond to the truth that a game company has life flattened only because it has a concession in hand that allows it to offer the product state game to the public. It would seem differently: it is undoubtedly easier for an illegal activity to have "interesting" economic gains and to take giant steps on the market that is left more and more often in illegal hands.

We must not forget, then, the Dignity Decree that in the perspective of the new generation game machines has provided for a series of significant measures. First of all, he ordered that access to these entertainment equipment for lawful game is allowed exclusively through the use of the health card with the aim of preventing their use from minors. Starting from January 1, 2020, therefore, the removal of devices without mechanisms suitable for preventing, as mentioned, access to minors, imposing an administrative sanction to those who do not adapt to this new rule consisting of ten thousand $ will be started For each appliance. And then they say that the life of the dealer, manager and the operator of the public game is a golden life ... Well, some perplexities honestly could also have.

Publication date: 23 June 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly