Many operators of the Game of Gambling Ribelli to the DPCM

In recent weeks there has been a lot of talk about some operators in the game, also owners of virtual mess, of Rome who, united, presented to the Prime Minister and, for information to the Council of State, about twenty requests in self -protection to underline that they considered the measures issued by Prime Minister Conte regarding the closures of the various commercial commercial activities, since not They were supported by the opinion of the Technical Scientific Committee who obliged its closure, and asked for its revocation. The same path and the same ending (closing) which, however, were also reserved for restaurateurs to whom the same committee would always have expressed "go -ahead" opinion for their work, always following the protocols necessary to be able to keep the premises open. The Rome Law Firm that assists the operators of the game had requested an answer relating to the revocation of the closing measures by the central government which is not (obviously) arrived. Which presupposed, but which thus determined the "transformation" of these instances into real appeals to the TAR, regional administrative court, of Lazio.

From here, evidently, it is destined to start a strenuous battle between the operators of the game and the state in which the former will be strong in the ruling of the civil court always of Rome who expressed themselves with an opinion of illegitimacy expressed and motivated against always of the same DPCMs who had decreed the closure of certain exercises. This closure deemed "illegitimate, discriminating, unjustified and unmotivated" that imposed the total lockdown in the world of games went to oppose with other sectors that continued to fully exercise their business: certainly with restrictions, but to be considered potentially more at risk of others In terms of spreading the crownavirus, since it is easy to understand that to consume food and drink it is still essential to lower the mask. It can be thought that this "mass rebellion" by about twenty operators in the game has requested in addition to the reopening of its activities, at least a compensation for the economic damage unjustly suffered, and that there are no few at all.

It is now aware that the refreshments made available by the premier are not enough to support companies and for this reason the Roman law firm has requested an "ad hoc refreshment" for each company by the same represented also taking into account the contributions as a lost fund already made available by the government. These were the intentions of the "rebels of the game" and, as anticipated, not having had a response from the Presidency of the Council were presented to support the appeals to the TAR, each for each operator involved in this self -protection action which will undoubtedly be intended for Make discuss. It should not be hidden that since the "birth of the DPCM" that imposed the closure of the exercises to counter pandemic, requests for reopening activities had already been promoted in different forms. But today's attempt is aimed precisely at "disassembling the system of the provision itself", also referring to the contents of the guidelines provided by the Technical Scientific Committee that has clearly proven to be "not in agreement" on certain choices taken by the Premier, having declared that some categories could always remain open following the prevention rules.

Precisely in the measures taken by the Presidency of the Council for the containment of the contagions, therefore the prohibition of aggregations and assembly seems to be not able to apply to ten thousand rooms from gamble "Stop" for a long time since the capacity of these premises does not justify their stop. Even more questionable is the motivation relating to the closure of the games indicated as in the problem "in which the game points are reached". The widespread presence of the public gaming points is such as to allow players a scaglion in accessing the exercises and it will never be "assembly" in these premises: it seems quite obvious that not everyone "goes to have fun at the same time" and prohibit Access to the game seems truly absurd and incongruent. A further argument supported by the "legal rebel lawyer" is that both the CTS and the DPCMs speak of the entertainment sector without any indication of the products and beyond all about the game sector, we just say that it is not indispensable And, therefore, it can stop.

Without taking into account that the closure of all the public game involves an inevitable deviation of the game flow to the illegal one which, however, is always open and available H/24 with the consequences that can be imagined both for the social and for the territory null However, for this determination that the game is not essential, and therefore it can close itself, what to say about the lotteries or of the Scratch and win And 10elotto sold in restricted spaces such as tobacconists with respect for their work? Why have these games do not follow the fate of entertainment equipment, the usual "machines" with which everyone always take it? All these observations have been submitted in the appeals to the TAR in the hope that in the next decree we can deal with the issue of public game no longer with the superficiality with which it has been addressed until now during the restrictive imposition phase.

Honestly it is thought that the 180 days of closing the game in this Benedetto 2020 were more than enough and that one can look at this sector with more attention was nothing more for the number of workers who contains, but also for "justice" in relation To the assessments that have been made for other exercises that have continued to remain open and which, undoubtedly, can be judged more at risk of those of the game. And who knows that once for the game sector, a more equitable and favorable evaluation of its opening, albeit "time" and with all the security protocols that, among other things, the professionals have shown have been applied to the game to respect. At no game or room poker, in the limited opening that has been allowed to him, a outbreak of contagion was born: but, evidently, this too was not taken into consideration, just to change ...

Publication date: January 8, 2021 at 13:49

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly