The agitated waters surrounding American terrestrial casinos

The company properties of the Tricolor gaming houses, perhaps, "they are pulling the rope a little too much" towards their employees and trade union acronyms that represent them. Perhaps, the same properties think that "hunger to arrive at the closure of a contractual negotiation" is a vehicle to be exploited to get to propose negotiations in some aspects that are truly absurd to such an extent that by the unions are even apostrophized as "nefarines". It can be said that the negotiation for the closure of a new employment contract for the employees of the Venice casino (which is missing since 2017) is truly bad, due to those "agitated waters" that are always making sure to remove More the parts from the final "port" that should undoubtedly be interested in both parties: which in fact does not appear at all. But here, in these lines and in this context, and as if it often happens to us, we do not want to do politics, but only to report the facts that are happening at the Venice casino.

It is not possible to find peace in its organization and the union acronyms want to explain the reasons why they did not want to take part in the meetings convened precisely by the ownership of the game house at the "apparent end" to trace agreements for the new contract for employees of that casino, placed in one of the most enchanting cities of our peninsula, but which is passing on to an economic level, of results and future projections not a good moment, like the whole world of gambling on the other hand. The negotiation on the new collective business contract, in fact, already lives difficult moments that seem to also complicate more than necessary due to further obstacles. But you want to see the reasons that pushed the union acronyms SLC CGIL, Fisascat Cisl and Ugl Tertiary not to participate in the last meeting, scheduled for last March 14: but, in explaining their abstention, at the same time We want to emphasize that hard criticisms are also aimed at both the ownership of the gambling house and to the management of the same.

And this because since the resumption of negotiations for the new contract the clear feeling has been received that there was no haste to reach an agreement: proof of it are the "elongated over time" meetings, the inconclusive meetings and, to finish, everything surrounded by rigid positions to the bitter end and seasoned by arrogance so strong as to make it clear that there was no true desire to conclude a negotiation as delicate as the closure of a collective work contract. In short, to be even more "bad" in reporting the feeling of the union acronyms, it can certainly be said that the negotiation table, not to safeguard the Best casino sites, it was formally open, but in fact it was completely proven and unproductive. On the part of the trade union organizations, however, you want to comply with your role of building a negotiating course to get to the final lens to provide the employees of the tricolor gambling house with a new contract that has been missing for a couple of years ... which is not little.

The points that made the nerves "unions" are three and appeared in the immediate absolutely incomprehensible prejudice: obligation of the withdrawal of art.28 by all the OSS, economic proposals even lower than those of the unilaterally imposed regulation and Finally, an indeced indication that "not even the same regulation guarantees the economic and financial balance of society" ... are preliminary to the good end of the absolutely absurd negotiation (always to say of the union acronyms): and to enter specifically if it can Indicate a fairly distressing further detail. The company gives an award to employees and the same structure risks default: on the relief of this operation it has been replied that the gambling house "was generous with employees". And following a sort of "correction of the shot" by the Administration, the "apologies" proposed have absolutely not convinced the union interlocutors.

According to the three initials, then, the criticisms that can be moved to this corporate management, in fact commissioned, are infinite and even embarrassing: in fact, during a technical meeting always last week, the same management has climbed the mirrors in the mirrors interpretation of an article of the regulation relating to staff training (moreover written by the same company and imposed on employees) absolutely inapplicable in a particular structure such as that of a gambling house. But since at worst there is never an end, as they say, the unions underline how much the managers behaved even worse when they respond "to the warning on the regime of distribution of the result prize" which includes unprecedented discrimination. Not even with the presence at this meeting of a municipal manager, useful to confirm that the three company representatives have absolutely no "freedom of maneuver or decision", it was possible to (or want) to grasp the weight of this warning, nor the severity of the theme "discrimination in the workplace", nor to finish the need to fix and review some "rules of the game", Moreover, written badly by the company management, but in any case made to undergo all employees of the casino.

A situation that includes open and embarrassing issues: all this together convinced the three trade unions not to attend the last call proposed by the property. Of course, there is a limit to everything and the attitude that the company management puts in place towards the unions and employees that they represent, denotes a lack of respect for the interlocutors that the gambling house has faced in a Table that should have as an objective that of the "construction" of something, instead of enclosing almost its "destruction". Yet, the example of the failure of the American champion casino should teach something to those who direct a similar structure: the "breakdown" that has been created in that ancient company, the lack of the future of its employees and what to All this can undergo the eyes of foreign investors could suggest different attitudes ...

Publication date: March 29, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly