The negative relationship between politics and gambling

Arrived, very probably, at the end of this yellow-green executive, given his experience of about a year and a half and without entering an effective policy speech, one cannot exempt from "pulling the sums" of his work since The same was, without a doubt, schizophrenic and negative in some measures undertaken on the one hand, but also positive and harbinted, on the other, of a future possibility in relation to a sustainable game and to the Best online casino safer. A swing of "feelings" not very controlled and undoubtedly hostile, in reality, made his relationships with the world of gambling managed to a part of the government: first in the electoral phase and in the first months of government with a hatred and an obsession "relemeed and offensive" and, subsequently, with an "almost normal" application of the resources of the recreational sector. And the latter should represent the rational part of a country that deals with the public game as a resource and certainly not as an enemy from which we must defend himself and eradicate with every possible weapon.

This is why, now, we want to make a sort of balance of the executive behavior in order to extract, in the end, that experience that can be exploited for a positive future of the relationship between the game and institutions, even if it will not be an easy -to -view company The rather marked alternation of the attitudes and measures taken: absolutely negative sometimes and positive and forward -looking in others. The absolutely deleterious provision, and not only against the public game, but also for other sectors involved such as sport and communication, was the total prohibition of advertising contained in the dignity decree: decree that will also discuss other contents e of which he will "tell" later. Then, prohibition of advertising: never the lowest point of the public game, with implications that are still to be quantified and also a provision that is leaving more than heavy brackets relating to the guidelines of Agcom which, to say the executive, have weakened it.

So, lowest point for The world of games which is facing an unimaginable situation before now and consequences that are also affecting international level: without, however, wanting to evaluate the judgments from abroad of realities that, albeit distancely, would examine such a prohibitionist path null It is inevitable that this ban will have "negative returns": first of all, of course, that of the illegal game that will replace the lawful one, considering its "unavailability" which is increasingly present in the area. Prohibition of advertising that goes to accompany the "territorial question", never resolved, and which in recent months is felt more, since on some territories the public game has been defended and expelled. The territories find themselves confronting the rebirth of the illegal game with everything that this drags behind in terms of safety for citizens and for their personal protection.

Now, it can be said that these two interventions, the prohibition of advertising contained in the dignity decree and the failure to solve the "territorial question" have meaning, or at least that they are meaning, a collapse of the entire game supply chain making any socket useless Location of the operators of the game, of the trade associations, of the whole industry since they are two situations that "deliberately influence the recreational sector that, on the other hand, could lead" strength to all our national economy ". Instead, perhaps, it can be a sort of awareness in this sense faced by the executive today in crisis, where in the study and announcement of a new lottery (of the fees or the receipt, then, will be seen) and in the restoration of the "old totocalcio" it sees two initiatives with which the game is seen (finally it could be suggested) as a resource, a means for the social and no longer an enemy To be fought by force.

And in addition it should also be noted another provision: to use a part of resources from the game of lot to subsidize culture and the fine arts. Too bad that it is a "very limited" initiative, but it could be considered a good start for future growth Of a relationship between institutions and gambling, as useless to underline it, it exists in other states where the same game does not suffer the prejudices that instead our Italico game is forced to suffer. So, despite the prohibition campaigns that have been put on the pitch, all the arrows launched against the game as soon as the opportunity presented, with the leaving time you can notice perhaps a slight change of course and pity that this happens presumably at the end of the mandate of the yellow-green executive. Strengths were being born that could be opposed to the legislative initiatives dictated by the obsession and political schizophrenia: the lottery of the fees and the totocalcio had glimpsed a positive reading of the playful sector.

That is, consider public game as a resource and no longer an opponent. Use a lottery as a fight against tax evasion and also at the same time as entertainment, but not considering it a gambling (who knows why, given that even the "Grattini"They are considered, by the yellow-green, gamble), trying with this means of directing the American people to legality, clearly seemed a" political gesture "towards the game: or at least this is a point of view that" we like " may exist. As well as seemed to be almost tangible that the intention of creating and allocating new funds to the world of sport had been hidden in the announced restyling of the old Totocalcio. These two specific initiatives bring to mind the famous "purpose tax" subjected to politics by the same game industry, to make it more sustainable by fixing a fixed fee of the game proceeds for very specific social purposes as other states already applied successfully: yes They see the "good causes" existing in the United Kingdom, from which we should draw a lot at least as regards the experiences relating to the institutions-games relationship. There would be something to learn, there is no doubt!

Publication date: September 2, 2019 at 12:00

casino	Review	Visit
	888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500	Visit
	Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $	Visit
	LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$	Visit
	Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$	Visit
	Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	Starcare 50 Giri + 200$	Visit
	BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $	Visit
	william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$	Visit
	NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $	Visit
	Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$	Visit
	Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $	Visit
	Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $	Visit
	Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300	Visit
	Want to win 100% up to $ 1000	Visit
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly