Council of State: another pronunciation in favor of the game
It is certainly not possible to say that it is not of a wide satisfaction for those who also love the world of gambling and gods a little. Best casino sites with slot, being faced with any pronunciation issued by the judges who is oriented in favor of the game activities that, continuously, appeal to the now famous "expulsive effect" descending from the regional laws that can increasingly complicate life of public game, instead of regulating it. Game that, with the utmost sincerity, would really like to be able to work with serenity and, above all, by virtue of their state concessions that should allow the best of their task of "state reserves" and thus represent the legality of the products and the safety in the territory in the playful field. But now, even those who only partially follow the problems of the games, know that this has not happened for a long time and are also aware that the experts of the game really never have peace, absolutely. The "culprits" are first of all the regional laws, then the pandemic emergency, but also the more than unfair competition by the illicit game, trimmed throughout the territory with strength and cunning.
All things that, certainly, do not transmit tranquility. Yet the regional administrations do not give up and, unfortunately, in some territorial realities the expulsive effect is a "certainty" that is certainly not good for the sector, much less to its players who are looking for an open game point, Hoping that they do not come across, on the other hand, quite usual, in an illegal room ready to welcome them with open arms. In addition to all these events, it must be forcibly adding that the total prohibition of advertising is putting itself in the midst of an already terribly uncomfortable situation and prevents, especially for grass players, to be able to understand if they are comparing themselves with a legal game or with One who just is not. And also with all the consequences that can derive from attending illegality in relation to the safety of the same player and the payment of the winnings that too often and willingly "jump"!
And despite all the "alarms" that the legal sector puts in place, there are still people who involve themselves from illegal game, with this state of affairs, to say the least dangerous, "we like" certainly refer to a last pronunciation of the Council of state that can be "told" as follows: the Municipality of Cattolica, by virtue of the regional law on the game of Emilia Romagna, imposed the closure of a VLT room located near a church, considered a so -called sensitive place: the point of Game not respecting the distance of the 500 meters could be obliged to lower the shutters. This is the premise to which the Council of State replied by saying that the fulfillment of the expulsive effect that the applicant had exposed had to be considered a question to be ascertained at the merits. But the judges of the CDS added that in waiting of the indispensable time to carry out the judgment on the merits, the need for the continuation of the commercial activity of the video-Lottery room which, otherwise, would have suffered irreversible damage, had certainly prevailed.
And he adds whoever writes, also given the very long times of our justice and of carrying out the various criminal and civil and administrative proceedings. Thus, therefore, according to the opinion of the CDS, the game exercise was destined to remain open obviously with all due respect to the Municipality of Cattolica who wanted exactly the opposite. Moreover, as transpires into the "desires" of all those local authorities that still act today by virtue of these regional laws "capestro" that leave no room for the commercial life of the public game, wanting that in fact it is banned from the territory, even if this is there It seems a decidedly execrable thought as it has been repeatedly underlined in our writing on the subject. On the other hand, we are also aware that that territory has definitely deployed against the world of games from the beginning, "hiding" behind the ill -concealed objective of counteracting the problematic or compulsive game and instead acting directly against the game sector That, above all, precisely in that reality he had given employment to many people who in the different case would have found themselves without work.
But, evidently, the employment problem does not touch the practicality of that administration and its political sphere that continue to show ostracism towards the playful world, its businesses and its operators. Instead, and fortunately, some regions have taken a small step back and have decided to put their laws on the game in stand-by waiting for the delegation law to accompany the national reorganization of the entire game sector to appear on the horizon. Reform that will put an end to all those "overlapping regulations" that have created a situation of open discomfort for the legal game, unfortunately favoring the rebirth of the illegal game. Who knows if this criticality has been well weighed by those territories that do not give up and continue to fight against the legal game and also against everything he represents: the legality of the game e The security of the playersnull Someone seems to be forgotten about all this and this definitely "doesn't like"!
But to return to the pronunciation of the judges of the Council of State we want to underline that according to them the appellant had undoubtedly an interest in knowing the decision on the merits of the dispute since the applicant operator had started the movement of his activity, which is economically demanding and uncomfortable for customers in the "first VLT room", only to comply with the provisions of the Municipality by virtue of the regional law on the game of Emilia Romagna and certainly not finding itself "in agreement" nor passively accepting what is imposed. It is useless to underline that in the applicant's opinion this imposition was totally expelled in relation to his business, but had respected the closing order while not sharing the terms in the most absolute way. To the judges of merit, therefore, "the arduous sentence" and in the hands of them the interpretation of the expulsive effect that all the commercial activities of that reality are "forced" to suffer.
Publication date: 12 May 2024 at 11:55 am
casino | Review | Visit |
---|---|---|
888 casino 20 $ free + up to $ 500 |
Visit | |
Snai Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Betway Casino 5 $ Free + 300 $ |
Visit | |
LeoVegas Casino 250 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
Digital game casino 370 Giri + 500$ |
Visit | |
Eurobet Casino 30 Giri + 1005$ |
Visit | |
Bwin Casino 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
Starcare 50 Giri + 200$ |
Visit | |
BIG Casino 55 $ FREE + 300 $ |
Visit | |
william hill casino 200 Giri + 1000$ |
Visit | |
NetBet Casino 10 $ Free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Pokerstars Casino 500 Giri + 2500$ |
Visit | |
Betflag Casino 1000 $ free + 1000 $ |
Visit | |
Casino.com 10 $ FREE + 500 $ |
Visit | |
Unibet casino 100% up to $ 300 |
Visit | |
Want to win 100% up to $ 1000 |
Visit | |
The game is forbidden to minors under 18 and can cause pathological addiction Play responsibly |